Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
Yorco and Zortech are two corporations that employ large numbers of full-time workers who are paid by the hour. Publicly available records indicate that Yorco employs roughly the same number of such hourly wage workers as Zortech does but spends a far higher total sum per year on wages for such workers. Therefore, hourly wages must be higher, on average, at Yorco than at Zortech, since _____. - Zortech spends a higher total sum per year than Yorco does to provide its hourly wage workers with benefits other than wages 削弱
- the work performed by hourly wage workers at Zortech does not require a significantly higher level of skill than the work performed by hourly wage workers at Yorco does 文中么没有提到skill,即使对也有削弱的嫌疑,提供了Y公司的wage实际上不高的原因
- the proportion of all company employees who are hourly wage workers is significantly greater at Yorco than it is at Zortech 也有削弱的嫌疑,提出比较的基础不一样
- overtime work, which is paid at a substantially higher rate than work done during the regular work week, is rare at both Yorco and Zortech 说明比较的基础一样,不是加班导致了工资的提高
- the highest hourly wages paid at Yorco are higher than the highest hourly wages paid at Zortech 无关,涉及的是average wage.
我也是刚起步,只是提一下自己的看法,希望多多切磋。谢谢!
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-14 23:13:03编辑过] |