[求助]gwd31-16-11, 先谢一个

glgry

Q11:

In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations.  However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools.  This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.

 

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

 

1. The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia’s government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.
2. During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.
3. Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia’s government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.
4. Teachers in Vargonia’s government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.
5. During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.

答案是B，没有弄明白。B中的privately funded schools和when economy has been strong都让我觉得它是无关项。我觉得A正确，因为A说目前的“学生老师比”比最近一次Recession时还高，也就是说老师的相对数量目前比Recession时还少，这样就是说，即使没有新的立法，也不可能再减少老师职位的数量。

请大家不吝赐教。谢谢！

xuehanfei

题目说的意思如下：

一般来说，在经济不景气的时候找工作很难，因为此时大多数行业都要裁员；而对于公立学校来却能够提供更多的工作。原因是经济不景气，收入减少，很多家长将学生从收费高的私立学校转到免费的公立学校，增加了公立学校的学生数目，此时公立学校就需要招收更多的老师，因此此时公立学校能够提供更多的岗位。

简要的说：公立学校的在校学生人数与经济繁荣成反比

A选项，不对，因为实际上学生与老师的比例一般变化不大，因为学生多了老师就要多，学生少了老师就把多余的老师开掉，即使不开，这个时候学生/老师也是比经济不景气的时候小。

glgry

谢谢了，解释得很清楚！