OG-109

joywzy

以下是引用anchoret在2003-11-3 19:55:00的发言：
2. 完全可以用主动，不是只能用于被动或过去分词的修饰上

谢谢小安。是这样的。

JerryGuan

以下是引用braveMBA在2003-10-28 11:28:00的发言：
sb    require    of    sb    to    do    是    wordy的表达方式，直接使用sb    require    sb    to    do.

require    of    sb    to    do    经常用在被动的方式或者说过去分词的形式来修饰名词，例如    sb/sth    required    of    sb    to    do    is/does......，以前讨论过，另外OG里还有一题，你用required    of    搜索一下OG。

sb/sth是中心词,required    of    sb    to    do    is/does修饰sb/sth


sb/sth    (are/is)     required    of    sb    to    do    is/does

泰格尔

我还不明白OG对于D的解释：In D, the phrase beginning regardless ... is awkward and wordy in addition to being illogical.

我想问的是，究竟是ETS认为“regardless of这一结构在GMAT语法中是错的”还是“ETS认为在该短语后接名词性从句是错，但若接名词就对了”？？？

但朗文认为regardless of = irrespective of, 且有如下例句：All children should have access to the latest technology, irrespective of where they live or how much their parents earn.

这该如何解释？？？谢谢！

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-24 23:03:01编辑过]

alicely

请nn看看这里

109. Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.
(A) that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are
(B) that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills
(C) to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are
(D) to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills
(E) to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills

In C, the use of in rather than for is unidiomatic, and jobs of comparable skill confusedly suggests that the jobs rather than the workers possess the skills.

为什么说jobs of comparable skill confusedly suggests that the jobs rather than the workers possess the skills？

alicely

第二个问题：关于that的修饰对象

109. Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.

不是认为“that"引导非限制定从，紧跟其修饰对象么

这个“that”是不是可能修饰它前面的“skill”，而不修饰“jobs”，可是按照题目应该修饰“jobs”，是不是“that”可以跳跃修饰呢？在og152里找到又一个that不紧接修饰对象的例子，请nn解释一下“that”引导定从修饰对象的情况吧：）

152. When the technique known as gene-splicing was invented in the early 1970’s, it was feared that scientists might inadvertently create an “Andromeda strain,” a microbe never before seen on Earth that might escape from the laboratory and it would kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it.

心晴

to alicely:jobs of comparable skill ，这里job是核心词，comparable skill 是修饰job的，所以说这个短语的意思是“有相应技能的工作”，类似的用of连接的两个词，一般都是of前是核心词，of后面的修饰of前面的词

关于第二个that的修饰问题，that引导定从的时候可以跳跃修饰，特别是本题that后面是are，所以在这里that只可能是修饰jobs，不可能是skill，没有歧义的。

心晴

看了半天，还是没明白require of到底能不能用。我总结一下：

require sb. to do

require of sb that

这两种形式应该是都对的，大家都没有什么异议。

那require of sb to do呢？对吗？或者说是在什么情况下对？请NN解答。谢谢！：）

r1418

require 有3种用法

require sb to do,  require of sb that, require that

至于上面说到的that的问题,定语从句可以紧跟先行词,也可以跳跃修饰

至于如何判断修饰的是谁,可以看看that后面的谓语

拿这道题说,that 后面是are, 而skill是单数，所以that是修饰jobs

zhoushao

以下是引用r1418在2004-10-25 13:49:00的发言：

require 有3种用法

require sb to do,  require of sb that, require that

至于上面说到的that的问题,定语从句可以紧跟先行词,也可以跳跃修饰

至于如何判断修饰的是谁,可以看看that后面的谓语

拿这道题说,that 后面是are, 而skill是单数，所以that是修饰jobs

以下是引用心晴在2004-10-19 9:57:00的发言：

看了半天，还是没明白require of到底能不能用。我总结一下：

require sb. to do

require of sb that

这两种形式应该是都对的，大家都没有什么异议。

那require of sb to do呢？对吗？或者说是在什么情况下对？请NN解答。谢谢！：）

同问，require of sb to do被动就可以吗？为什么呢？

薰衣紫草

require of sb + that(虚拟)