OG-109

joywzy

109.    Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.
(A) that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are
(B) that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills
(C) to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are
(D) to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills
(E) to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills

如果不考虑其它错误,C/D/E中,为什么OG说require of .... employees to pay, in whch of makes the phrase incorrect????

谢谢

braveMBA

sb require of sb to do 是 wordy的表达方式，直接使用sb require sb to do.

require of sb to do 经常用在被动的方式或者说过去分词的形式来修饰名词，例如 sb/sth required of sb to do is/does......，以前讨论过，另外OG里还有一题，你用required of 搜索一下OG。

joywzy

BRAVE GG:

在OG181中，出现了require of firms to survive, ...such firms

因为我记住了这个例子，所以想这种用法也是对的。require of sb. to do sth.

braveMBA

JOY，以后问题建议用统一的格式，看看GEMJ斑竹的小字报说明。：）

请注意，181就是我说的，是过去分词（表示被动的含义）才使用required of sb to do sth，当主动的时候，不使用这种方式，应该直接使用require sb to do sth! 如OG 109中的讲解。

joywzy

谢谢brave GG.这又是我的一个语法缺漏啊.

joywzy

require of sb. sth.是不是与require of sb. to do sth .一样，只能用于被动或过去分词的修饰上??谢谢。

anchoret

以下是引用joywzy在2003-11-3 19:22:00的发言：
require of sb. sth.是不是与require of sb. to do sth .一样，只能用于被动或过去分词的修饰上??谢谢。

idiom:

require sb to do
require of sb that...

joywzy

以下是引用joywzy在2003-11-3 19:22:00的发言：
require of sb. sth..是不是与require of sb. to do sth .一样，只能用于被动或过去分词的修饰上??谢谢。

再问。小安，你再看看我的问题。

anchoret

1. require of sb that...不可以用require of sb sth

2. 完全可以用主动，不是只能用于被动或过去分词的修饰上

joywzy

以下是引用anchoret在2003-11-3 19:55:00的发言：
1. require of sb that...不可以用require of sb sth

LZM P 250有require of sb sth，可他举的例子却是 require of sb that...好奇怪。。。