ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6087|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 26-18

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-12-24 18:16:00 | 只看该作者

gwd 26-18

18. GWD26-Q18

A medieval manuscript called L contains all eighteen extant tragedies

by the Greek playwright Euripides. Of these, ten called the “select

plays,” are accompanied in L by ancient commentaries and also

appear in other medieval manuscripts; this group includes some of

Euripides’ best-known works, including the Medea. The other eight,

which appear in alphabetical order, without commentary. The Electra is

one of the alphabeticals.

Which of the following can be reliably concluded on the basis of the

Statements given?

A.    Only Euripides’ best-known works are accompanied by ancient

commentaries in extant medieval manuscripts.

B.    The select plays are accompanied by ancient commentaries

because they were the best known of Euripides’ works.

C.    No commentaries were written about Euripides’ Electra in

ancient times.

D.    Euripides’ Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts

unaccompanied by ancient commentary.

E.     Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a com-

mentary in any extant medieval manuscript.

The Answer is E. I wonder how it derives " 
                
Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a com-mentary in any extant medieval manuscript" from "Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied in L".

So confused.. Can anyone help? Thanks!

沙发
发表于 2006-12-24 18:40:00 | 只看该作者

I saw the same issue. Anyone can explain this?

板凳
发表于 2007-1-5 16:16:00 | 只看该作者

有个叫L的mm包含18个现存的t,18个t分为两部分,第一部分是10个t,叫sp,伴随着ancient commentaries,而且这10个t也会出现在其他的mm中,这些t包括Medea;剩下来得8个t按照字母排序,没有commentary,Electra
            
是其中的一个t。

A.     Only Euripides’ best-known works are accompanied by ancient

commentaries in extant medieval manuscripts. 为涉及

B.     The select plays are accompanied by ancient commentaries

because they were the best known of Euripides’ works. 未涉及

C.     No commentaries were written about Euripides’ Electra in

ancient times. 文章只是说Electra 没有commentary,并没有说这些commentary是写在古时候,而且也没有说Electra 一定是Euripides’

D.     Euripides’ Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts

unaccompanied by ancient commentary.  只是说Medea 有commentary并不能推出Medea 一定从来都没有出现在mm中部伴随着古代的评论

E.      Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a com-

mentary in any extant medieval manuscript.  是按字母顺序出现,所以就不会重复出现,文章已经说了Electra 是分在这个叫L的mm中的另外8个没有commtenary的et中的,所以Electra 不会伴随着评论出现在任何一个现存的mm里面

不知道有没有帮助的~~

地板
发表于 2007-1-5 17:43:00 | 只看该作者

A. is not right coz --> this group includes some of

Euripides’ best-known works (some are not the best-known), including the Medea.

B. is not right coz -- the same reason to refute A

C. we cannot judge according to the information stated in the question -- the statement related to the past

D. we cannot judge according to the information stated in the question -- the statement related to the past

E. Electra not in the 10 pieces group that appear in other medieval manuscripts and are accompanied by ancient commentaries (in the manuscripts)

5#
发表于 2007-1-6 19:16:00 | 只看该作者

是啊,我也感觉奇怪.

有人说是C,但是你看看C说的是古时候没有对Euripides’ Electra的评论.原文只是说L对18个戏剧中的10个做了评论,可没保证没有其他人不对另外的8个不做评论吧.

有人说是E,但是E说的是在现存的中世纪的手稿中,Euripides’ Electra都没有被评论.原文只是说手稿L不评论,并不表明其他现存的中世纪手稿里面没有评论吧(或许有或许没有)

6#
发表于 2007-5-12 17:55:00 | 只看该作者
ding
7#
发表于 2007-6-19 17:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用cccccc0在2007-1-5 16:16:00的发言:

有个叫L的mm包含18个现存的t,18个t分为两部分,第一部分是10个t,叫sp,伴随着ancient commentaries,而且这10个t也会出现在其他的mm中,这些t包括Medea;剩下来得8个t按照字母排序,没有commentary,Electra
   
是其中的一个t。

A.     Only Euripides’ best-known works are accompanied by ancient

commentaries in extant medieval manuscripts. 为涉及

B.     The select plays are accompanied by ancient commentaries

because they were the best known of Euripides’ works. 未涉及

C.     No commentaries were written about Euripides’ Electra in

ancient times. 文章只是说Electra 没有commentary,并没有说这些commentary是写在古时候,而且也没有说Electra 一定是Euripides’

D.     Euripides’ Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts

unaccompanied by ancient commentary.  只是说Medea 有commentary并不能推出Medea 一定从来都没有出现在mm中部伴随着古代的评论

E.      Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a com-

mentary in any extant medieval manuscript.  是按字母顺序出现,所以就不会重复出现,文章已经说了Electra 是分在这个叫L的mm中的另外8个没有commtenary的et中的,所以Electra 不会伴随着评论出现在任何一个现存的mm里面

不知道有没有帮助的~~

Not quite sure I get it. How to explain "any" when the arg only talks about L?

8#
发表于 2007-7-22 14:31:00 | 只看该作者

原文:A medieval manuscript called L contains all
                
eighteen extant tragedies

by the Greek playwright Euripides.

E.      Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a com-
                

mentary in any extant medieval manuscript.

所以说这个any是合适的。

9#
发表于 2007-7-31 02:42:00 | 只看该作者

ding

还是不懂为什么选e!!

10#
发表于 2007-8-14 03:27:00 | 只看该作者

原文:A medieval manuscript called L contains all
                
eighteen extant tragedies

by the Greek playwright Euripides.

E.      Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a com-
            

mentary in any extant medieval manuscript.

所以说这个any是合适的。

===============================================================

没看出来这两者之间有什么必然联系:题目中的all是说L中包括了那位剧作家所有的18件作品。但没有说只有L中包括了,可能其他的手稿中也包括了。而E选项中的any是说其他任何的中世纪手稿中都不曾出现。

all指的是作品,any指的是手稿,不知道你说的“从all可以推导出any”的这个逻辑关系如何成立?


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-23 04:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部