ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 11064|回复: 22
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 38讨论及请教

[精华] [复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-10-27 12:18:00 | 只看该作者

OG 38讨论及请教

第3题答案是b, 我不解??

沙发
发表于 2003-10-27 14:11:00 | 只看该作者
INFER题就是SUGGEST的,而非在文中有明确表述的

这里是表述由CENSUS反映SOCIAL CHANGES

由1840,CENSUS可以定位到L5,往下看,作者说INDIVIDUALS是以OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORIES来分类的,说明NONFARMING OCCUPATIONS已经很多,不然怎么拿来做为分类标准?而且文中出现的ENTERPRISES等暗示了NONFARMING的发展方向

为了确定答案,看其他4个选项,都是很容易排除的
板凳
发表于 2005-1-29 21:28:00 | 只看该作者
那为什么E不对呢?

(E) Men engaged in agriculture

应该也是被统计了啊?

地板
发表于 2005-1-29 23:05:00 | 只看该作者

能否貼出原文及問題呀,方便大家看看.

5#
发表于 2005-1-29 23:17:00 | 只看该作者

Passage 38

During the nineteenth-century, occupational information about women that was provided by the

United States census-a population count conducted each decade-became more detailed and precise

in response to social changes. Through 1840, simple enumeration by household mirrored a

home-based agricultural economy and hierarchical social order: the head of the household

(presumed male or absent) was specified by name, whereas other household members were only

indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories, including occupational

categories. Like farms, most enterprises were family-run, so that the census measured economic

activity as an attribute of the entire household, rather than of individuals.

The 1850 census, partly responding to antislavery and women’s rights movements, initiated the

collection of specific information about each individual in a household. Not until 1870 was

occupational information analyzed by gender: the census superintendent reported 1.8 million

women employed outside the home in “gainful and reputable occupations.” In addition, he

arbitrarily attributed to each family one woman “keeping house.” Overlap between the two groups

was not calculated until 1890, when the rapid entry of women into the paid labor force and social

issues arising from industrialization were causing women’s advocates and women statisticians to

press for more thorough and accurate accounting of women’s occupations and wages.

6#
发表于 2005-1-29 23:18:00 | 只看该作者
我看了OG的解释,明白了一半了。在文中,presumed male or absent是作者的假设,因而不能拿来当成实际的普查中将men如何如何count了,这样理解对不对?
7#
发表于 2005-1-29 23:20:00 | 只看该作者

第三题也贴出来供参考

238. It can be inferred from the passage that the 1840 United States census provided a count of

which of the following?

(A) Women who worked exclusively in the home

(B) People engaged in nonfarming occupations

(C) People engaged in social movements

(D) Women engaged in family-run enterprises

(E) Men engaged in agriculture

8#
发表于 2005-1-30 12:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fdpy在2005-1-29 23:18:00的发言:
我看了OG的解释,明白了一半了。在文中,presumed male or absent是作者的假设,因而不能拿来当成实际的普查中将men如何如何count了,这样理解对不对?


嗯,我觉得这是一方面,但同时应注意到文章中说,统计是以从事农业家庭的户主为主,其他成员则不分男女,仅有从事各职业类别的数量:Through 1840, simple enumeration by household mirrored a home-based agricultural economy and hierarchical social order: the head of the household (presumed male or absent) was specified by name, whereas other household members were only indicated by the total number of persons counted in various categories, including occupational categories.
所以从事农业的其他男性的具体数目不详.E不对.
只有B的数据可以得到.

9#
发表于 2005-1-30 20:57:00 | 只看该作者

嗯,这下清楚了。感谢斑竹这些天不辞辛苦的回答俺的问题。

GMAT刚刚开始,蠢问题还要继续下去。。

10#
发表于 2005-1-30 21:00:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fdpy在2005-1-30 20:57:00的发言:

嗯,这下清楚了。感谢斑竹这些天不辞辛苦的回答俺的问题。


GMAT刚刚开始,蠢问题还要继续下去。。



你提出的問題都很值得思考的.


回答大家的問題,對我也很有幫助的.謝謝大家.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-29 00:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部