ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1561|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 3-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-9-29 03:58:00 | 只看该作者

gwd 3-4

Q4:

In the year following an eight-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell ten percent.  In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen one percent.  The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.

 

The argument above requires which of following assumptions?

 

  1. During the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes did not increase by as much as it had during the year prior to the tax increase.
  2. The one percent fall in cigarette sales in the year prior to tax increase was due to a smaller tax increase.
  3. The pretax price of a pack of cigarettes gradually decreased throughout the year before and the year after the tax increase.
  4. For the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes was not eight or more cents lower than it had been the previous year.
  5. As the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes rises, the pretax price also rises.

why choose D. Many thanks.

沙发
发表于 2006-10-11 01:35:00 | 只看该作者

same question, I think it should be A

板凳
发表于 2006-10-11 05:41:00 | 只看该作者

算个数学题。前一年,sales降了1%;收了8cents税,sales又降了10%。 --〉sales因为税降了

如果实际价钱便宜了8分钱,也就是说即使收了8cent税,价钱不变。这样要是sales降了10%的话,显然不是8分钱税的原因。

看A,说收税以后价钱没升。如果价钱升了呢-->sales降了10%, 这个不能肯定sales下降不是税上升,而有可能是两者一起作用。

因为税的数量就是8cent,所以一旦8cent被balance了,就可以排除税起作用的可能性

地板
发表于 2009-6-7 15:12:00 | 只看该作者
第我觉得二年的pretax price亦不能涨太多,不然价格太高,收不收税都无太大分别,A有这个意思,当时就选了。。。
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-6-7 15:12:06编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-20 00:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部