ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1855|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

这个WEAKEN题,大家看看。

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-10-15 22:53:00 | 只看该作者

这个WEAKEN题,大家看看。

12.    Are you still reading the other newspaper in town? Did you know that the Daily Bugle is owned by an out-of-town business syndicate that couldn’t care less about the people of Gotham City? Read the Daily Clarion, the only real voice of the people of Gotham City!
Which of the following most directly refutes the argument raised in the advertisement above?
(A) Over half of the advertising revenues of the Daily Clarion come from firms whose headquarters are located outside of Gotham City.
(B) The Daily Clarion usually devotes more of its pages to out-of-town news than does the Daily Bugle.
(C) Nearly 40 percent of the readers of the Daily Clarion reside outside the limits of Gotham City.
(D) The editor-in-chief and all the other members of the editorial staff of the Daily Bugle have lived and worked in Gotham City for ten years or more.
(E) The Daily Bugle has been published in Gotham City for a longer time than has the Daily Clarion.

答案是D,但我觉的是B
沙发
发表于 2003-10-16 00:01:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得本文的逻辑是这样的:第一句是讲因为the Daily Bugle是镇外的一个报社组织(A),所以它couldn’t care less about the people of Gotham City(B),   A推出B;
第二句讲非B推出非A。
题目的意思则是在什么条件下,第一句或者第二句的逻辑关系不成立!
本文的关键点是报社是否是镇内的报社决定了它的可读性,而与报纸的内容无关!
D选顼则指出the Daily Bugle 的主要人员都在本镇内生活超出十年以上,所以care  about the people of Gotham City!
而B选项则完全脱离了本文所提的逻辑关系,没有从组织所属的关系来回答,仅仅从报纸的内容多少来回答,与本文内容不符!

不知回答对否,请版主指点!

板凳
发表于 2003-10-16 00:07:00 | 只看该作者
这些日子我看了LSAT和OG后,最大的体会就是逻辑的正确答案必须与原文所提内容是相关的,而不能横空出现不相关的内容!
上面的题目就是此原则的典型!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-28 21:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部