求助一道逻辑题

遥远的绿洲

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No". Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challengs indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

A) Why does the part that replies not answer, "Yes"?
B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?
D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

为什么选A,想了半天,实在想不通了.

gonghao

这题在OG11上有明确的解释

lz可以下载并参考、

遥远的绿洲

谢谢

gonghao

如果聋的和反应的部分是分开的话，那么问道他听见没的时候，如果是聋的部分起作用，应该是没反映。如果是听见的部分起作用，应该是回答yes。而文章回答是“no”

所以A是一个weaken的答案