GWD-30-Q37 有什么区别？？？

allen0018

    

1.       
GWD-30-Q35-Q37 巴西，香港，墨西哥，台湾，新加坡，韩国，台湾发展快，马来西亚，泰国不行

    

 (The following was
excerpted from material written in 1988.)

    

      For over a decade the

    

       most
common policy advice

    

       given
to developing countries

    

Line       by international development

    

  (5)      institutions has been to copy

    

the
export-oriented path of the

    

newly
industrializing countries,

    

the celebrated
NIC’s.  These

    

economies—Brazil,
Hong

    

 (10)      Kong, Mexico, Singapore,

    

South Korea, and Taiwan—

    

burst into the
world manufac-

    

turing market in
the late 1960’s

    

and the 1970’s; by 1978 these

    

 (15)      six economies, along with India,

    

enjoyed
unequaled growth

    

rates for gross
national product

    

and for exports, with exports

    

accounting for
70 percent of

    

 (20)      the developing world’s manu-

    

       factured
exports.  It was,

    

       therefore,
not surprising that

    

dozens of other
countries

    

attempted to
follow their model,

    

 (25)      yet no countries—with the pos-

    

sible exceptions
of Malaysia

    

and Thailand—have
even

    

approached their
success.  In

    

“No More NIC’s,”
Robin Broad

    

 (30)      and John Cavanagh search for

    

the reasons
behind these fail-

    

ures,
identifying far-reaching

    

       changes
in the global econ-

    

omy—from
synthetic substitutes

    

 (35)
               for
commodity exports to

    

unsustainable levels of foreign

    

debt—as responsible for a glut

    

economy offering
little room for

    

      new entrants.  Despite these

    

 (40)     changes,
the authors maintain,

    

the World Bank
and the Inter-

    

national
Monetary Fund—the

    

foremost
international devel-

    

opment
institutions—have

    

 (45)      continued to promote the NIC

    

path as the way
for heavily

    

indebted
developing countries

    

to proceed.  And yet the futility

    

of this approach
should,

    

 (50)      according to the authors, be

    

all too apparent
so many years

    

into a period of
reduced growth

    

in world
markets.

    



    

Q37:

    

The
author mentions Malaysia and
Thailand
in order to？？？？？？？？？？？？

    

             

    

1. acknowledge the
        appearance of implausibility in a broad claim
2. concede the possible existence of
        counter-examples to a generalization
3. offer additional evidence in support of a disputed conclusion
4. illustrate the broad applicability of a hypothesis
5. admit the limited scope of a standard analysis

abcindy

dozens of other countries

attempted to follow their model,

 (25) yet no countries—with the pos-

sible exceptions of Malaysia

and Thailand.......         

表示其它国家无法仿效，只有此2国家可以仿效，所以是counter-examples ，所以我检讨之后觉得B比较正确 ，  A感觉有否定整篇文章观点的意味(implausibility in a broad claim)，不想選A，请强者们指教 

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-9-20 10:36:07编辑过]

boochxu

Q35:

Given the information in the passage, which of the following is a true statement about the NIC’s?

             

1. Their economic success among developing countries has been exceeded only by the successes of Malaysia and Thailand.

2. By 1978 they produced 70 percent of the world’s manufactured exports.

3. In the late 1970’s, their growth rates for gross national product were among the highest in the world.

4. In recent years their development has been heavily subsidized by major international development institutions.

5. They received conflicting policy advice from international development institutions in the late 1960’s and the 1970’s.

 答案C， 这题没找着别的答案好选，可是C从文中何处得出啊？如是推出，也推得太远了吧。

mengyuan

顶出来，请NN 指点37T答案是A还是B？

我选B，LG选A。

干冰

谁能贴一下36啊 谢谢

ustc9718

以下是引用boochxu在2007-2-2 0:14:00的发言：

Q35:

Given the information in the passage, which of the following is a true statement about the NIC’s?

             

1. Their economic success among developing countries has been exceeded only by the successes of Malaysia and Thailand.

2. By 1978 they produced 70 percent of the world’s manufactured exports.

3. In the late 1970’s, their growth rates for gross national product were among the highest in the world.

4. In recent years their development has been heavily subsidized by major international development institutions.

5. They received conflicting policy advice from international development institutions in the late 1960’s and the 1970’s.

 答案C， 这题没找着别的答案好选，可是C从文中何处得出啊？如是推出，也推得太远了吧。

反而我看到的答案版本是E，非常疑惑

andylouis

UP

andylouis

UP

lnz0414

第35题文中第16行有个unequaled,就等同于highest阿

sch

第35题文中第16行有个unequaled,就等同于highest阿

*********************************

多谢楼上的mm!无语了,这篇我错光了, DAA....

unequaled=无敌的,无比的,adj

哎,我理解成了"不相等的"---------->认为他在说,NIC国家之间的GNP数字也是不一样的,有高有底.........吐.

另外Q37:
yet no countries—with the possible exceptions
of Malaysia
    

and Thailand—have
even

    

approached their
success.

我觉得这里插入部分主要是想说,"就算马来西亚泰国都搞不定"把,而不是说它们有希望称为NIC.

".......然而没有(其它)国家---算上最有可能是例外的马来西亚和泰国---用此方法成功过"

所以我觉得B不对,b是认可可能的例外.而实际上作者的意思是让步:"就算这些后来模仿的国家中,最有希望成功的泰国马来西亚,都没有成功"