[求助]GWD5-3

Sunny1000

GWD5-3

Q3:

The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia.  Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed.  However, recent statistics show a droip in the number of television assemblers in Borodia.  Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

A.      The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.

B.       Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have.

C.       The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.

D.      The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years.

E.       The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years.  不明白為何答案是C ? 我選了D

zlily424

The number of television sold annually in Borodia has not changed.Since the number of assemblers in Borodia has dropped, the author assumes that the number of television each assember can assemble stays the same.As a result,the number of imports from Vernland must increase in order to maintain the same number of televisions sold annually in Borodia.In drawing this conclusion, the author overlooks the possibility in C that The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.

Sorry, I have no Chinese software, can't type Chinese. Hope it will help.

Nathenial

楼上说的很透彻。

我理一下逻辑关系是：第一句话说V的生产成本比B低。第二句话应该想说B的市场已经饱和，因为降低关税销量还是不变。第三句话说B的生产厂商减少了。第四句话是结论：B会从V进口更多的电视。

这道题关键在第三句话上面，就是厂商少了电视少了，所以才会更多的进口满足需求。所以假设就是B的生产效率没有提高。其它的选项都无关，尤其是提到V的状况，V对这道题没有什么用处的。

如果选项有B的市场需求没有减少应该也是对的吧。

Nathenial

回头来查这个题发现当年自己写的思路很清楚嘛，哈哈哈哈

阿土莎莎

Brilliance

,