Acting on the recommen- dation of a British government committee investigating the Line high incidence in white lead (5) factories of illness among employees, most of whom were women, the Home Sec- 法规颁布 retary proposed in 1895 that Parliament enact legislation (10) that would prohibit women from holding most jobs in white lead factories. Although the Women’s Industrial Defence Committee (WIDC), formed (15) in 1892 in response to earlier legislative attempts to restrict women’s labor, did not dis- count the white lead trade’s WIDC反对,认为是缩减女性工作机会的又一案例 potential health dangers, it (20) opposed the proposal, view- ing it as yet another instance of limiting women’s work opportunities. Also opposing the proposal was the Society (25) for Promoting the Employment of Women (SPEW), which SPEW和WIDC认为生产环境是产生生病的原因 attempted to challenge it by investigating the causes of ill- ness in white lead factories. (30) SPEW contended, and WIDC concurred, that controllable conditions in such factories were responsible for the devel- opment of lead poisoning. (35) SPEW provided convincing SPEW:工人更注意清洁现有措施更严格实施,则铅中毒将不会发生 evidence that lead poisoning could be avoided if workers were careful and clean and if already extant workplace (40) safety regulations were stringently enforced. How- ever, the Women’s Trade Union League (WTUL), which WTUL:支持法规实施,因为现有措施得不到真正实施,且没有工会的力量施压保证安全措施 had ceased in the late 1880’s (45) to oppose restrictions on women’s labor, supported the eventually enacted proposal, in part because safety regu- lations were generally not (50) being enforced in white lead factories, where there were no unions (and little prospect of any) to pressure employers to comply with safety regulations. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q35: The passage is primarily concerned with - presenting
various groups’ views of the motives of those proposing certain legislation - contrasting
the reasoning of various groups concerning their positions on certain proposed legislation - tracing
the process whereby certain proposed legislation was eventually enacted - assessing
the success of tactics adopted by various groups with respect to certain proposed legislation - evaluating
the arguments of various groups concerning certain proposed legislation - 答案施E 我选了B,两者最大区别好像施contrasting和evaluate,我在文中没有看到作者的评价啊,为什么是evaluate呢?我觉得只是简单的陈述对比,请指教,谢谢!
|