ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2461|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-21-28 讨论很长时间,但是没有结果

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-9-4 20:26:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-21-28 讨论很长时间,但是没有结果


    

 GWD21-Q28:


    

Since it has become known that several of a
bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s
depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending
financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. 
They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the
bank’s financial soundness,
those worrisome rumors must be false.  They might well be overoptimistic,
however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own
company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s
health.


    

 


    

In the argument given, the two boldfaced
portions play which of the following roles?


    

 


    
  1. The first
         summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the
         argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument
         relies.
  2. The first
         summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the
         argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by that
         evidence.
  3. The first
         is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into
         question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the
         support for this intermediate conclusion.
  4. The first
         is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into
         question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the
         argument.
  5. The first
         is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into
         question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported
         by this intermediate conclusion.
大家说说那两句话什么作用???
怎么就成了中间的结论了

沙发
发表于 2006-9-4 23:21:00 | 只看该作者

Evidence:several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank
-->Intermediate conclusion:top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness-->those worrisome rumors must be false

Main conclusion: the investors are wrong,They might well be overoptimistic

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-9-6 11:01:00 | 只看该作者
They reason that( since) top executives evidently have faith in the
bank’s financial soundness,
those worrisome rumors must be false.
            


但是这里的since 呢???
如果是中间结论,那
those worrisome rumors must be false. 这是什么???

        
地板
发表于 2006-9-6 12:55:00 | 只看该作者

since在这里是because的意思,但是后面的句子并不是一个evidence,真正的evidence是it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank。而也是一个推论,由这个推论,引出最后的结论those worrisome rumors must be false.这都是depositors的观点。

D中的main conclusion是作者的最后观点。

5#
发表于 2006-10-21 15:13:00 | 只看该作者

...

6#
发表于 2006-10-21 15:17:00 | 只看该作者

是不是黑线部分错了...D的后面顺眼 其他的都不太顺眼

7#
发表于 2006-11-21 16:45:00 | 只看该作者
No best, the better might be the choice.
D is better than A.


8#
发表于 2006-11-21 21:06:00 | 只看该作者
ding
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 07:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部