- UID
- 455262
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-7-16
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
We sometimes call this type of question "relevant information".
Relevant information questions are a hybrid str/wkn question type. What we're really asked to determine is which answer choice is most inside the scope of the stimulus.
The choices are almost always questions. In the correct choice, one answer to the question will strengthen the argument and the opposite answer will weaken the argument. The 4 wrong choices will all be outside the scope (i.e. irrelevant).
In the question quoted above, we're trying to figure out why the gel is more effective than the lozenge. The author's explanation focuses on where cold viruses congregate. In any argument in which an author is explaining a phenomenon, we should always wonder if there are any other viable explanations.
Answer (D) addresses that last point, raising the possibility that there are other factors responsible for the difference in effectiveness of the two remedies.
If the gel/lozenge DO contain ingredients that impact the effectiveness of the zinc, the author's argument is weakened, since those ingredients could be responsible for the difference in effectiveness.
if the gel/lozenge DO NOT contain such ingredients, the author's argument is weakened, since we've eliminated another possible explanation.
(B) is outside the scope - we don't really care if there are any non-zinc effective oral remedies, since we have no clue how they work (for all we know, those oral remedies shoot antibiotics up into your nasal passage). _________________ Stuart Kovinsky, B.A. LL.B.
Academic Manager
Admissions Consultant
Kaplan Test Prep & Admissions
Toronto Office
1-800-KAP-TEST
GMAT Blogs
|
|