应该是C. Mel的论述中,结论明显是The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation Pat的response:No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation.也正是P的conclusion.后面是premise. 所以c项attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect,正是它论点所在,而merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects是指出由premise到conlusion的推理错误. A项重心明显是关于premise的,而response 应该是对应于conclusion的. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation Pat的response:No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation.也正是P的conclusion.后面是premise. 所以c项attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect,正是它论点所在,而merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects是指出由premise到conlusion的推理错误. A项重心明显是关于premise的,而response 应该是对应于conclusion的. |