ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: wei_wangyan
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[梦之队日记] Sailing to success(快乐备考,携手同行)

[精华] [复制链接]
1671#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-24 00:45:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用XVVjing61在2007-1-23 23:37:00的发言:

GWD7-Q33:
  
真想撞死,郁闷
                

The health benefits of tea have been the subject of much research; in addition to its possibilities for preventing and inhibiting some forms of cancer, the brewed leaves of Camellia sinensis may also play a role in reducing the risk of heart disease and stroke.
        

  1. in addition to its possibilities for preventing and inhibiting

  2. in addition to its possibilities to prevent or inhibit

  3. besides the possibility that it prevents and inhibits

  4. besides the possible preventing and inhibiting of

  5. besides possibly preventing or inhibiting

这道题的答案应该是Eit的指代可以排除A/Bbesides的逻辑主语可以排除C/D剩下的只有E

我不明白,it是怎么排出a/b的???besides的逻辑主语是怎么排出c/d的????


晶晶,这是谁的解释啊?千万别逮着一个解释不放啊,尤其是看不明白的时候。

偶排除AB的方法很简单,认为its应该指代leaves,但单复数不一致。C同理。

besides有逻辑主语的问题需要考虑吗?(难道是因为可能理解成possible preventing/inhibiting或者说C、D中的名词形式与leaves并列吗?脑子不够用的,想不出来。。。)

besides是介词,可以接名词或-ing形式(字典上有例句),所以E是正确的(possibly是副词,说明后面两个是分词,不是动名词)。

D怎么看怎么不舒服:prevent,inhibit都有名词形式,干嘛要用动名词呢?

1672#
发表于 2007-1-24 02:13:00 | 只看该作者

有闹闹和晶晶的鼓力,打算每天坚持录入:

An 800 test taker knows that the two most common ways to weaken an argument are by breaking down the argument's central assumption, and by asserting alternative possibilities relevant to the argument.

An 800 test taker knows that numbers and statistics can be fertile ground for all sorts of qustions. She knows these questions may ask her to find the choice that points out a flaw or weakness in an argument, or that resolves an apparent discrepancy. Either way, she recognizes that understanding the ways in which numbers and percentages are used--or misused-- is the key to answering any question concocted out of a numeriacal or statistical situation.
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-24 4:00:33编辑过]
1673#
发表于 2007-1-24 02:25:00 | 只看该作者

楼主help!~

逻辑有什么办法?速度一上,错误狂飙!~

laywer那套理论有用吗?我都没感觉!你做题先看文章,还是先看问题?

1674#
发表于 2007-1-24 02:29:00 | 只看该作者
I am not LZ, but ls.  Answer your question before LZ comes to it.   Of cause read question first, then passage.  Regarding theory,  you should take advantage of other's theories but make sure form your own reasoning pattern and crack CR strategy before you sit test.
1675#
发表于 2007-1-24 02:38:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fantasy06在2007-1-24 2:29:00的发言:
I am not LZ, but ls.  Answer your question before LZ comes to it.   Of cause read question first, then passage.  Regarding theory,  you should take advantage of other's theories but make sure form your own reasoning pattern and crack CR strategy before you sit test.

谢谢,你的建议。

我还有疑惑,我感觉先读问题和先读文章好像没有一点区别。先看出是何题型对看题的重点和解题的速度都没有影响。

而且那些因果分析,断桥搭桥的等等,都是事后的分析。好像对做题的时候没有帮助阿!只有把答案选出来的时候才知道条件和结论的推导关系阿!

1676#
发表于 2007-1-24 03:30:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得你说得对,我也是逻辑速度慢,自从FF135后,做OG第一编速度还行,可自此后,就没碰过CR,导致GWD摸考时CR耗时最多。我想我们是否需要多练习呢?比如大权。

至于先读题的好处,题目读完,正确答案心中就有个预想了,然后再确认问题,就直奔那个长得最像的,我这样做遇到容易的还行,但是遇到难得容易误排除,因为选项读的太粗,而且如果遇到有些难题读完了心里没一点方向,还得逐个分析每个选项,有时得耗4分多钟呢,时间都够上一篇短阅读了。

待讨论。。。

1677#
发表于 2007-1-24 06:29:00 | 只看该作者

粪哥,如果真想一劳永逸解决速度和正确率问题,就拿lsat开到吧

不过练不到一个月产生不了效果...

1678#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-24 09:36:00 | 只看该作者

逻辑偶直接没有发言权,做大全、GWD和PREP一直都是逻辑的错误率居高不下。。。。

跟当年晴天小狗似的,该用的资料差不多都用了,FF135也做了(感觉这个东东的阅读难度并不高于GWD,虽然很长,但很好懂),死活不开窍,真没办法了~~~~~~~~~~

说实话,偶是OG看了三四遍之后才对LAWYER的总结有点感觉的(偶是觉得他的理论超级有用的,其实偶看过一个外国人写的关于如何学习LSAT逻辑的材料,LAWYER的东西基本上是将其精简之后英译汉,连分类都是一模一样的,而且也听说LAWYER考了LSAT呢,他的东东很棒,好好体会吧),但至今仍不会举一反三。

速度上呢,一直以来最快的速度就是2分钟一道,经常还在看不懂的上面纠缠,浪费无尽宝贵时间。。。

1679#
发表于 2007-1-24 12:03:00 | 只看该作者

the last three notes about CR 800 strategy:

An 800 test taker understands the relationship between groups represented in the stimulus, and specifically knows which connections are necessary, and not necessary, between them.

 

An 800 test taker knows that the logical gap that results from a scope shift can often be bridged by an assumption.

 

An 800 test take recognizes the difference between causation and correlation, and is intimately familiar with the ways in which the GMAT tests this distinction.

I will post Reading Comprehension Strategy later...


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-24 12:04:39编辑过]
1680#
发表于 2007-1-24 12:47:00 | 只看该作者

800 CR Strategies:

General pointers:

l         Keep your eye out for the author’s evidence, conclusion and any assumptions relied upon in the argument.

l         Paraphrase the text

l         Familiarize yourself with the common Critical Reasoning concepts tested.

 

800 Reading Comprehension Strategies

 

General Pointers:

l         Read for the author’s purpose and main idea.

l         Paraphrase the text

l         Create an outline, or “roadmap”, of the passage.

l         Don’t overinvest. Reading passages vary in length from 150—300 words with 2-5 questions.  Aim to spend no more than 4 minutes reading even the most difficult passage and spend an average of 1 minute per question.

l         Read the explanations.

 

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-25 16:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部