ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: wei_wangyan
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[梦之队日记] Sailing to success(快乐备考,携手同行)

[精华] [复制链接]
1321#
发表于 2007-1-8 11:50:00 | 只看该作者

晶晶也是一月考吗?

1322#
发表于 2007-1-8 12:20:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fantasy06在2007-1-8 11:30:00的发言:

着急呀,我总比大家慢好几拍。讨论题目都不同步。今天才做到CD8-GWD10. 超时10分钟,SC是连着错,Reading是几乎全篇覆没,今天错了16个,SC7 RC7 CR2

一道逻辑请教大家,为什么选A不选C?

GWD-10-Q29GWD-2-14

Smithtown University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.  This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.  On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.  The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

 

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

 

  1. Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.

  2. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.

  3. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.

  4. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.

  5. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.


原文说,S大学能拿到80%他们所contact的donor的赞助,但这么高的比例却不表明他们很努力。因为通常以前捐过钱的人会比较倾向于再捐啦,所以努力的fund-raiser应该去不断开发新的donor,而开发新的donor会导致那个捐赠比例下降。问支持。

A.S大学游说新的donor赠钱的成功率与别的学校是一样的。也就是说S的overall捐赠比例比别人高就是因为游说新donor少咯~可以代入数学算算,设S与另外一所学校X都找了10个老donor,成功率都是100%吧,而找新donor的成功率大家又是一样的,60%吧,S找了10个new donor,成功了6个,A找了20个new donor,成功了12个,那么overall successful rate:

S=(10+6)/(10+10)=80%

X=(10+12)/(10+20)=73%

由此可见,S的总比例高是因为它不努力呗~

C.今年大部分捐款来自于哪些以前捐过钱的,现在不用contact就自动来捐钱的银。这个选项的确挺迷惑人的,大部分钱不用contact就得来了。但是想想,new donor有可能每一个捐的钱都很少,我可能得很努力contact很多个new donor才能集到这小部分的捐款呢?!

1323#
发表于 2007-1-8 12:22:00 | 只看该作者

另外fanfan啊,偶认为不要为了赶进度而拼命做GWD,效果不好不如不做。一天一套差不多了~

1324#
发表于 2007-1-8 12:42:00 | 只看该作者
(Sorry.  I am using other's computer now and can only type English.)

Thank you Jojo for your quick and exciting response!  You are so great!   Your translations and equations used to addess the effort issue make sense to me a lot!
 
I understand now A is better than C.   Aha, it is a math problem again.  I failed the fourth time for CR concerning percentage or figures.  

Is there any CR problem set focus on math issues such as percentage, price, figure, etc.?


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-8 13:01:23编辑过]
1325#
发表于 2007-1-8 14:16:00 | 只看该作者
哈,目前好像还米有这样的总结,等你战胜了G之后来总结一稿,造福之后的千千万万CDer如何?!
1326#
发表于 2007-1-8 14:29:00 | 只看该作者

Fanfan:

我是2月初考试,和你们差不了几天,一想到等大家都考完了,就剩我一个了,55555555555555555555555

我同意jojo姐的看法,不要赶进度,没有效果。闹闹昨天和我同电话也是这么给我说的,因为我中间停了一个月时间,一点感觉都没有了。心里很着急

闹闹也是这么和我说的,如果时间紧,可以全部精力放在前13套上,原因有二:1,这些有牛人的发言和讲解,很有用。13套以后的牛人基本都没发言了。2,13套以后的就有大全的题目了。

希望对你有帮助

1327#
发表于 2007-1-8 17:18:00 | 只看该作者

大家行行好,帮帮我吧,我又找不到东西了

哪有GWD配套的数学阿,可以看讨论的??????

1328#
发表于 2007-1-8 17:18:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fantasy06在2007-1-8 11:30:00的发言:

着急呀,我总比大家慢好几拍。讨论题目都不同步。今天才做到CD8-GWD10. 超时10分钟,SC是连着错,Reading是几乎全篇覆没,今天错了16个,SC7 RC7 CR2

一道逻辑请教大家,为什么选A不选C?

GWD-10-Q29GWD-2-14

Smithtown University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.  This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.  On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.  The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

 

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

 

  1. Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.

  2. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.

  3. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.

  4. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.

  5. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.


For this logical question, I think the right answer is C.

A talks about contact frequently the potential donors than others, and the information cannot support the argument.

C talks about donation came from people who donated before without contacting by the university fund raisers, and those information support the argument that the high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

1329#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-8 17:34:00 | 只看该作者

看看吧,情绪还是受GWD影响,说不在意那结果是假滴,不是真滴。。。

偶刚刚做完CD14,错了一大堆:SC-3,CR-6(一半),RC-6(有一篇全军覆没!)。

超时5分钟,前面的速度掌握还不错,做完30题时还有17分钟,可是17分钟我是做不完11道题的,所以必然超时了,赶时间,最后一篇阅读根本没读懂,全错,今天不会猜了,咔咔~~~~~最后11道题里错了6个!!!

现在对逻辑有点回天无力的感觉了,不知道是怎么回事,总是把选项都给排除掉,还是感觉逻辑越来越难读懂,现在又对逻辑怕得要死,像回到了当初一样,但当时看OG时不懂是因为没思路,现在是因为读不懂。唉,究竟该怎么办啊???

有人说是因为我对长难句比较绕的那一种句子不熟,建议看杨鹏难句(偶曾经看过那个),可是,读语法的句子也没觉得非常吃力啊,读阅读也感觉还凑合啊?怎么一读逻辑就晕晕晕晕晕!

救命。。。。。。。。。。。。。。


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-8 17:51:35编辑过]
1330#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-8 17:49:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用littlecase在2007-1-8 10:46:00的发言:

闹闹谢谢你详细的解答,说得很有道理,我服了。

谢谢了。

其实现在这段时间我心情不好,完全是受自己做题影响所致,还好有姐妹们的支持!为了考g我放弃了这么多,然而却没有回报。复习了很久,却总是像什么开始一样,心情极度郁闷。培养良好的心态确实很重要,考g靠的不仅是英语考试,更重要的是多种能力的体现,短时间解决问题的能力,高度压力下自我调整的能力,锻炼正确心理素质的能力,以及厚积薄发的能力。姐妹们,我们一起加油!

刚才发现很多做过得gwd和没有做过一样,错的仍然继续错。今天不做新题了,该好好总结一下。

 

越是到复习后期,考试前期,越觉得自己缺乏这样的能力,越心慌,真正的能力越受影响,越郁闷…………越循环。。

自己的GWD做得越来越差,越来越没感觉,不知道是不是因为赶时间影响了正确率,但愿如此吧?

我要把逻辑重新做一遍,TNND

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-2-17 12:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部