ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1356|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

FEIFEI-40 ,简单题求助

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-8-7 16:37:00 | 只看该作者

FEIFEI-40 ,简单题求助

40. More and more computer programs that provide solutions to mathematical problems in engineering are being produced, and it is thus increasingly unnecessary for practicing engineers to have thorough understanding of fundamental mathematical principles. Consequently, in training engineers who will work in industry, less emphasis should be placed on mathematical principles, so that space in the engineering curriculum will be available for other important subjects.

 

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument given for the recommendation above?

 

A.        The effective use of computer program that provide solutions to mathematical problems in engineering requires an understanding of mathematical principles.

B.        Many of the computer programs that provide solutions to mathematical problems in engineering are already in routine use.

C.        Development of composites and other such new materials has meant that the curriculum for engineers who will work in industry must allow time for teaching the properties of these materials.

D.       Most of the computer programs that provide solutions to mathematical problems in engineering can be run on the types of computers available to most engineering firms.

E.        The engineering curriculum already requires that engineering students be familiar with and able to use a variety of computer programs

为什么C不能削弱呢,选时大概浏览了一下毕竟时间紧迫,感觉说的是一个principle吧,虽然说法抽象,但适用阿;

  A.  more computer programs(math...)are produced  ---〉  unnecessary to understand math principles

      -----〉  less emphasis on math principles, let space be abailable for other subjects.

逻辑简图画出来了,知道答案想说math还是很重要不能省略,但一时绕不过,表达“math很重要”这个意思A选项还是不准确阿,都说了solutions to mathematical problems 很多了啊

请指教!!!

沙发
发表于 2006-8-8 02:39:00 | 只看该作者

Q: less emphasis should be placed on mathematical principles
C: must allow time for teaching the properties of these materials.

C  doesn't weaken the argument。 how much time must be allowed for math? less time and less emphasis on it than before? then it supports the argument

A  shows that efforts on math can't be reduced since engineers have to know math to use the programms effectively.

板凳
发表于 2006-8-8 11:14:00 | 只看该作者

development of MATERIALS?

what does the argument concern about the materials?

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-8-8 17:45:00 | 只看该作者

明白了,似乎和推理说的不是一个情况,应该是无关

谢谢两位~~


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-8 17:45:24编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-4 19:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部