ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In two months, the legal minimum wage in the country of Kirlandia will increase from five Kirlandic dollars(KD5.00) Per hour to KD5.50 per hour. Opponents of this increase have argued that the resulting rise in wages will drive the inflation rate up. In fact its impact on wages will probably be negligible, since only a very small proportion of all Kirfandic workers are currently receiving less than KD5.50 per hour.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 10191|回复: 27
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-25-2 (此题没有讨论过)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-28 13:55:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-25-2 (此题没有讨论过)

1.         GWD-25-Q2
                

In two months, the legal minimum wage in the country of Kirlandia will increase

from five Kirlandic dollars(KD5.00) Per hour to KD5.50 per hour. Opponents of

this increase have argued that the resulting rise in wages will drive the inflation

rate up. In fact its impact on wages will probably be negligible, since only a

very small proportion of all Kirfandic workers are currently receiving less than

KD5.50 per hour.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Most people in kirlandia who are currently earning the minimum wage have

  been employed at their current jobs for less than a year.

B. Some firms in Kirlandia have paid workers considerably less than KD5.00

  per hour, in violation of kirlandic employment regulations.

C. Many businesses hire trainees at or near the minimum wage but must

  reward trained workers by keeping their paylevels above the pay level

  of trainees.

D. The greatest growth in Kirlandia’s economy in recent years has been in

   those sectors where workers earn wages that tend to be much higher

   than the minimum wage.

E The current minimum wage is insufficient for a worker holding only one job 

to earn enough to support a family ,even when working full time at that job.

答案是B吗?我觉得是E啊???

题目不是要WEAKEN 这个吗:In fact its impact on wages will probably be negligible

沙发
发表于 2006-7-28 17:03:00 | 只看该作者

原题说大部分工人工资高于5.5,可是B却说有些公司低于5,我不知道为什么这项weaken.它直接反对原文条件.
我选了D。因为我们要削弱的是“对工资影响而造成的通货膨胀率增加是可以忽视的”,即通货膨胀率增加不能忽视。D说经济增长都在工资高于最低工资的部门,那么最低工资并不会影响这些部门,相反,低工资部门经济并没有增长,反而工资要提高, 这样当然增加通货膨胀率。


这相当于对一个没有经济增长的经济体提高物价一样,直接导致通货膨胀率增加。

我的拙见,其他选项我认为无关。

open to discuss.


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-28 17:05:22编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2006-7-28 22:49:00 | 只看该作者

the correct answer should be C.

the other choices are not related.

it was discussed before, please check for the links.

地板
发表于 2006-8-3 18:26:00 | 只看该作者

支持C,记得以前很久的时候QQ群里讨论过的

NN说是C

当时BC争得不可开交

5#
发表于 2006-8-3 20:12:00 | 只看该作者
...
6#
发表于 2006-9-24 10:50:00 | 只看该作者

ding

7#
发表于 2006-10-21 18:46:00 | 只看该作者

...

8#
发表于 2006-10-21 18:47:00 | 只看该作者
c,我也觉得是这个样子的
9#
发表于 2006-10-28 16:12:00 | 只看该作者

B是对的

原题目条件: 说最小工资从5美元每小时涨到5.5美元,会导致通货膨胀

结论:      支持者说不会,因为只有小部分人目前低于5.5美元,加到5.5不会有什么影响

哪一个是削弱结论,意思就是削弱支持者的结论,(也就是支持反对者,涨到5.5会导致通货膨胀)

B答案说目前很多公司违反劳动法,员工工资低于5美元,意思支持者的论据站不住脚,(题目中支持者是承认从5美元

每小时涨到5.5美元,会导致通货膨胀)

C其实是个无关选项

D选项太复杂了,超过了GMAT考察的范围,(考试时候不能加入太多的联想和推理)


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-28 16:25:48编辑过]
10#
发表于 2006-11-21 21:39:00 | 只看该作者
ding
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 04:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部