ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1414|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

额地神啊,阅读该怎么办啊?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-6-10 14:22:00 | 只看该作者

额地神啊,阅读该怎么办啊?

本人阅读og看了两遍并看了解释,现在作精读,基本按照小安阅读法的方法分析,和上次作og隔了近一个月吧,现在重新开始做时,发现错误率急速上升!有的几乎全错!我都快哭了!列举一道信息题,这样的题,信息点定位那么多,难道读的时候就把信息记住么?大家帮帮忙吧,我现在都不想做阅读了!

是不是阅读一不做,他就不认识我了?

It was once assumed that all living things could be

divided into two fundamental and exhaustive categories.

Multicultural plants and animals, as well as many unicellu-

lar organisms, are eukaryotic—their large, complex cells

(5)  have a well-formed nucleus and many organelles. On the

other hand, the true bacteria are prokaryotic cell, which

are simple and lack a nucleus. The distinction between

eukaryotes and bacteria, initially defined in terms of

sub cellular structures visible with a microscope, was ulti-

(10) mately carried to the molecular level. Here prokaryotic and

eukaryotic cells have many features in common. For

instance, they translate genetic information into proteins

according to the same type of genetic coding. But even

where the molecular processes are the same, the details in

(15)    the two forms are different and characteristic of the respec-

tive forms. For example, the amino acid sequences of vari-

ous enzymes tend to be typically prokaryotic or eukaryotic.

The differences between the groups and the similarities

within each group made it seem certain to most biologists

(20)    that the tree of life had only two stems.   Moreover, argu-

ments pointing out the extent of both structural and func-

tional differences between eukaryotes and true bacteria

convinced many biologists that the precursors of the

eukaryotes must have diverged from the common

(25)   ancestor before the bacteria arose.

            Although much of this picture has been sustained by

more recent research, it seems fundamentally wrong in one

respect. Among the bacteria, there are organisms that are

significantly different both from the cells of eukaryotes and

(30)   from the true bacteria, and it now appears that there are

three stems in the tree of life. New techniques for deter-

mining the molecular sequence of the RNA of organisms

have produced evolutionary information about the degree

to which organisms are related, the time since they diverged

(35)    from a common ancestor, and the reconstruction of ances-

tral versions of genes. These techniques have strongly

suggested that although the true bacteria indeed form a

large coherent group, certain other bacteria, the archaebac-

eria, which are also prokaryotes and which resemble true
                    

(40) bacteria, represent a distinct evolutionary branch that

far antedates the common ancestor of all true bacteria.

文种蓝色的是题目考察的内容。
                

181. All of the following statements are supported by the passage

 EXCEPT:E支持题
    
遇到这种题该咋办啊?定位那么难!
                

(A) True bacteria form a distinct evolutionary group.L37-38
                

(B) Archaebacteria are prokaryotes that resemble true

 bacteria.L38-40
                

(C) True bacteria and eukaryotes employ similar types of genetic

coding.L10-13

(D) True bacteria and eukaryotes are distinguishable at the

sub cellular level.L7-10
                

(E) Amino acid sequences of enzymes are uniform for eukaryotic

and prokaryotic organisms. L25-27

这篇passage29生词超多,都不知道怎么把这些生词定位,考试若遇到这种文章都不想读了!


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-10 14:25:04编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2006-6-10 14:53:00 | 只看该作者

如果已经读过两次OG,现在可以专门花时间做横向总结,总结后就可以知道什么样的方法是最适合自己的.没有这一步,用谁的方法都不好用.

列举题是很烦的,用排除法可以省时间.不过这种题在GWD中很少,不知道实战中出现的机会有多大,可能会有一些变形题,总的来说应该属于RC难题了,在你作横向总结后也可以找到方法解决它的.

板凳
发表于 2006-6-11 18:38:00 | 只看该作者
其实在总结这种文章的时候, 除了结构之外, 一些ETS 常用的干扰模式也需要留心注意一下. 当比较 eukaryotic & prokaryotic cell 的时候ETS替换了prokaryotic cell 而使用 true bacteria. 或直接用他们的名词形式 如 eukaryotes. 但还要注意的就是ETS 又使用了 bacteria 和 true bacteria 这两个容易搞混的名词. 但是如果把这些干扰的元素认出排除, 再用首字母提炼法替代特别的专有名词. 这篇文章其实很好定位的. 因为它的结构其实很简单. 先是说明自然界生物的两种归类,再说明两种归类相似及其相异处, 最后提出其实有第三种归类法的可能. 和大多数非自然科学的文章其实结构相同. 当然如果真的太缺乏自然科学的基本生字, 首字母提炼就算用了也效用不大, 在这种情况建议背一下基础的自然科学生字. CD上应该有人做过这样的生词分类。最后多注意ETS 叙述常用的干扰手法,再碰到相似的文章,就不会没办法专心分析文章的逻辑结构了
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-11 20:26:00 | 只看该作者
我第三次是在电脑里做的,这是不是和我平时在纸上读也有关系?
5#
发表于 2006-6-12 00:02:00 | 只看该作者
开始几篇应该会有差. 大概十篇后就没什么差别. 至少我是这样. 不知道参考的价值有多大
6#
发表于 2006-6-15 09:26:00 | 只看该作者
我对于这种文章也有些问题.....准备按小安的方法,集中突破. 拿一段时间来专攻这种文章应当会有突破.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-28 10:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部