gwd 29-8

titatita

Q8:

Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?

 

According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth.  This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth.  This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.

 

1. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
2. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
3. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
4. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
5. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth

   Answer: a

mine:e那位解释一下为什么?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

kallyli

those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced some growth,but the states with the strictest regulations have experienced higher growth, on this point, you can know conclude that environmental protection promopt growth.

"those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training" means that you cannot conclude the growth is contributed to strictest regulations but maybe to better education and job training.

mbz

"those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training"

I think the underlined assumption from the auther is that "education and job training have a positive effect on economic growth", and it happens that those states promote "education and job training"

titatita

明白了,他因法

mymengming

以下是引用titatita在2006-6-12 14:27:00的发言：
明白了,他因法

嗯,同错,同明白

gonghao

同志们讨论的很热烈呀

支持支持

顾风

这题我不同意：

我觉得答案B更合适，答案B说，在这些州，即使是中度严格的regulation也有比其它州不严格的经济增长快，充分的说明了这些州的特殊情况，如果要归类，A是B的特殊情况的一种，但A缺少拱桥，并且没有B直接。我认为此题是B.而A的education和economic的关联不是那么容易判定，因为任何一个州有regulation也必然有invest，而invest不管是什么都会促进经济增长，这是废话，我认为答案是B。

even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations

mymengming

好像拆散了比较对象了

This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth.

最高的是一组,其他一组

顾风

这个理由？

老兄，会不会太牵强了一些。。。

我觉得应该没什么问题。。。本来就是分成两组的，题干里面。。。

顾风

另外感觉这题也是逻辑大全里的。。。

不知道这个感觉对不对。。。