|
KATIEUS , 我选了一篇“有关经济类” 的短文 -- 我自己分析的逻辑结构图。
此题是比较简单, 但是她所具有的逻辑关系及明显的作者态度,都是我以前未能太注意的的。可能是我的水平太有限了, 直到现在才明白吧。  OG 10th --Passage 16 第一段:介绍过去,现在的公司策略的主要不同;及 变化。 1, Traditionally<时间带头>, the first<强调> firm to … from the unique opportunity<强调第一> to shape product definitions,…. <第一的优点>.
2,Today, however<强对比>, the largest payoffs<最大的好处> may go to companies that lead in developing ..approaches for successful mass production and distribution.<结论, 具备条件的公司将赢>
第二段; 举例, 支持. 1, for example<举例>, were first<以前的优点> in 1975, but <强转折> proved to be more <两者的变化>successful at forming strategic alliances<通过的方法> with other producers and distributors to.
2. Beta producers were reluctant to<对比> form such alliances and eventually lost ground to VHS<不幸的结局>
第三段;进一步 举例, 支持. 1, Despite Beta’s substantial technological head start< 支持作者观点-逻辑> and the fact that VHS was neither technically better nor cheaper than Beta, <进一步支持—逻辑>
2.developers of VHS quickly turned a slight early lead in sales into a dominant position<巨大的变化>. Strategic alignments <关键字>with producers of prerecorded tapes reinforced the VHS advantage<另一 方面的>. The perception among consumers that prerecorded tapes were more available<解释why> in VHS format further expanded VHS’s share of the market. By the end of the 1980’s. Beta was no longer in production<不幸的结局>.
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-10 8:04:26编辑过] |