ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: rheazhang
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[梦之队日记] 2006年8月队请进!欢迎大家来讨论

[精华] [复制链接]
391#
发表于 2006-7-11 10:57:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用顾风在2006-7-11 10:06:00的发言:

那题链接的解释很牵强。。。我觉得我的解释是最合理的,如果veterinarian是兽医的意思能被准确的翻译的话。。。呵呵

还是队长强啊!!

392#
发表于 2006-7-11 11:05:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用allen0018在2006-7-11 10:55:00的发言:

感谢顾风 回答数学

另外,我想知道你数学是怎么找到连接的?

tt 的题和xy,gwd编号对应关系是什么?

我没有找,数学只是做tt,错了搞不懂的我就直接提问了。。。偷了下懒。。。不好意思。
393#
发表于 2006-7-11 11:10:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用biss33在2006-7-11 8:20:00的发言:

5楼的回答很到位啊,D是攻击了CXC得有毒性,是他因削弱。MM有什么问题呢?

btw,mm是怎么做lsat的呢?我曾经尝试去做lsat,但是发现讨论连接很少阿,只能发贴问。觉得这样效率会很低的,后来就放弃了。


看了队长的解释,我现在更明白了,可以睡个安稳觉了。

要不是为了考个750+,我才懒得做LSAT。

一些比较难的题的讨论还是挺多的。我发现大部分没讨论的题都不难,像我这样的菜鸟都能作对。

有些郁闷难题,我就把他们当脑筋急转弯做,杀一杀多余的脑细胞,练练思维。

394#
发表于 2006-7-11 11:11:00 | 只看该作者
MM多余的脑细胞给我吧。。。
395#
发表于 2006-7-11 12:15:00 | 只看该作者

那我为什么直接问就被警告了呢?人品?赫赫

另外,这样不好啊,为什么我给的解释你们都懒得评价对错呢?

这叫我相当郁闷,我都不知道到底是理解对了,还是理解错了

396#
发表于 2006-7-11 12:45:00 | 只看该作者

一般这种情况属于你的解释是对的。。。

如果是错的或者有争议的,就会有评论。。。

397#
发表于 2006-7-11 13:45:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用allen0018在2006-7-11 10:45:00的发言:

我觉得这道题是充分和必要互相颠倒了

essensial 是必要

if 充分

说无关好像不太对

谢谢大家这么热心的回答,这道题我没有疑问,只是go so far as to这个短语

不明白确切的含义,在longman上找到了解释,和顾风说的差不多。

6
go so far/as far as to do something
(spoken) to do or say something extreme
->The government went so far as to try to arrest opposition leaders.

->I wouldn't go so far as to say that we agreed on the subject.

398#
发表于 2006-7-11 14:34:00 | 只看该作者

14.A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of vitamin C found that of a group of 600 people who regularly took 1,500 mg of vitamin C daily for a year, fewer than 9 percent suffered serious cases of flu; of a group of 600 people who took 250 mg of vitamin C (the standard recommended daily allowance) daily for a year, 34 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu; and of a group of 600 people who took no vitamin C for a year (other than that found in the foods in a balanced diet), 32 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu.

Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?

(A) The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing serious cases of flu increases in direct proportion to the amount of vitamin C taken.

(B) Vitamin C is helpful in preventing disease.

(C) Doses of vitamin C that exceed the standard recommended daily allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent.

(D) Massive doses of vitamin C can help to prevent serious case of flu.D

(E) A balanced diet contains less than 250 mg of vitamin C.

Hi guys,

I need your help. Why not choose C ? As far as I am concerned, C is more precise than D, because C gave more detailed numbers than D did. As to D, it just gave a very abstract concept " Massive"...but I was wondering...how massive is massive?  Any comments or thoughts on this problem?


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-11 14:37:51编辑过]
399#
发表于 2006-7-11 15:06:00 | 只看该作者

正是因为太精确,所以错了。

因为600个人是抽样调查,必然涉及到如标准差,方差的概念。通过这个调查,我们不能得到你这样精确的结论,必须要通过多组实验,然后说reduce the average incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent。

don't you think so?

400#
发表于 2006-7-11 15:08:00 | 只看该作者

另外 massive是相对于standard的描述,我个人觉得没有问题。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-24 21:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部