2006年8月队请进！欢迎大家来讨论

顾风

一道逻辑题，大家帮忙看看

In Kravonia, the average salary for jobs requiring a college degree has always been higher than the average salary for jobs that do not require a degree. Current enrollments in Kravonia’s colleges indicate that over the next four years the percentage of the Kravonian workforce with college degree will increase dramatically. Therefore, the average salary for all workers in Kravonia is likely to increase over the next four years.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Kravonians with more than one college degree earn more, on average, than do Kravonians with only one college degree. B. The percentage of Kravonians who attend college in order to earn higher salaries is higher now than it was several years ago. C. The higher average salary for jobs requiring a college degree is not due largely to a scarcity among the Kravonian workforce of people with a college degree. D. The average salary in Kravonia for jobs that do not require a college degree will not increase over the next four years. E. Few members of the Kravonian workforce earned their degrees in other countries.

答案是C，我觉得牵强了点。。。我觉得B不错。。。

jiefu

答案当然应该是C拉:

想想OG这类题的解释,一般大概会这样说:如果有其他原因导致higher salary这个结果呢? 如果不是简单因为学历高的缘故,比如是因为人少所以高,那么人多了,市场供应足够了,就可以不高了呀!所以,C的答案正好反映了这个问题,排除了由于人少所以才高的原因.

B的答案,OG一般都会这样解释:上学的目的和文章的问题不relevant! 千万要记住这个呀,非常重要!

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-25 19:22:22编辑过]

顾风

以下是引用jiefu在2006-6-25 19:07:00的发言：

答案当然应该是C拉:

想想OG这类题的解释,一般大概会这样说:如果有其他原因导致higher salary这个结果呢? 如果不是简单因为学历高的缘故,比如是因为人少所以高,那么人多了,市场供应足够了,就可以不高了呀!所以,C的答案正好反映了这个问题,排除了由于人少所以才高的原因.

B的答案,OG一般都会这样解释:上学的目的和文章的问题不relevant! 千万要记住这个呀,非常重要!

哦呵呵，B看花眼了，是上学的目的，我看成上学的人数的比例了。谢谢楼上。。

kevin5

麻烦大家给出一下注意。！

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=178805&page=1

allen0018

我现在是总结，

我在看白勇

我也不知道好不好这样

但是，白用上有500道题。还有制试点

大全上987

先作白勇应该稳赚不赔

adameye

以下是引用kevin5在2006-6-25 13:52:00的发言：

是不是可以参考下面这句话：

2. As a result of the continuing decline in the birth rate, fewer people will enter the labor force in the 1980’s than did in the 1960’s and 1970’s, a twenty-year period during which people born after the war swelled the ranks of workers. (主语people相同且无定语成分则省之，但did不能省)

 

摘自

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=81945&page=1

多谢kelvin.我还找到了OG上的另外一句。用法也一样。

187. In one of the bloodiest battles of the Civil War, fought at Sharpsburg, Maryland, on September 17, 1862, four times as many Americans were killed as would later be killed on the beaches of Normandy during D-Day.

(A)  Americans were killed as

(B)  Americans were killed than

(C)  Americans were killed than those who

(D)  more Americans were killed as there

(E)   more Americans were killed as those who

Choice A, the best answer, is the only option that accurately expresses the comparison by using the idiomatic form as many... as. In B and C, as many ... than is unidiomatic, and in C and E, those who is a wordy intrusion. In D and E, more is redundant because the phrase four times as many in the original sentence conveys the idea of more.

adameye

                

对于lawyer的assumption题中“条件型结论：结论带条件（即为充分必要）。ASSUMPTION的方法排除充分条件出现，必要条件不出现的情况。或充分条件一定能推出必要条件，或排除充分条件推不出必要条件的可能 。” 总是特别得不理解。谁可以给举个例子？

谢谢！

 

kevin5

以下是引用adameye在2006-6-27 2:16:00的发言：

多谢kelvin.我还找到了OG上的另外一句。用法也一样。

187. In one of the bloodiest battles of the Civil War, fought at Sharpsburg, Maryland, on September 17, 1862, four times as many Americans were killed as would later be killed on the beaches of Normandy during D-Day.

(A)  Americans were killed as

(B)  Americans were killed than

(C)  Americans were killed than those who

(D)  more Americans were killed as there

(E)   more Americans were killed as those who

Choice A, the best answer, is the only option that accurately expresses the comparison by using the idiomatic form as many... as. In B and C, as many ... than is unidiomatic, and in C and E, those who is a wordy intrusion. In D and E, more is redundant because the phrase four times as many in the original sentence conveys the idea of more.

也谢谢adameye，你让我再一次明白了OG的重大作用。

上面我问过了大家现在自己做大全没有突破，一直在犹豫要不要回到OG，

现在有答案了

BTW：你可以看一下OG11，里面的解释更好。

顾风

以下是引用adameye在2006-6-27 8:42:00的发言：

    

对于lawyer的assumption题中“条件型结论：结论带条件（即为充分必要）。ASSUMPTION的方法排除充分条件出现，必要条件不出现的情况。或充分条件一定能推出必要条件，或排除充分条件推不出必要条件的可能 。” 总是特别得不理解。谁可以给举个例子？

谢谢！

 

结论带条件的：

比如　某药对某类人群有效果，某个措施能解决交通堵塞等。。

shelleyzhao

我是１６．０８考，请加我一个