ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2476|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT 11-IV-19

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-9-28 06:15:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT 11-IV-19

19 Many people change their wills on their own every few years, in response to significant changes in their personal or financial circumstances. This practice can create a problem foe the executor when these people are careless and do not date their wills: the executor will then often know neither which one of several undated wills is the most recent, nor whether the will drawn up last has ever been found. Therefore, people should not only date their wills but also state in any new will which will it supersedes, for then there would not be a problem to begin with.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
(A) treats a partial solution to the stated problem as though it were a complete solution.
(B) Fails to distinguish between prevention of a problem and successful containment of the adverse effects that the problem might cause.
(C) Proposes a solution to the stated problem that does not actually solve the problem but merely makes someone else responsible for solving the problem.
(D) Claims that a certain action would be a change for the better without explicitly considering what negative consequences the action might have.
(E) Proposes that a certain action be based on information that would be unavailable at the time proposed for that action.

这道题在A和E中徘徊,最后还是选了E,答案是A.但是为什莫原文提出的不是complete
solution呢? E为什莫不对?
沙发
发表于 2003-9-29 04:56:00 | 只看该作者
(A) 题以上还是不能确认那个最最新的;一份遗嘱,虽然知道它取代的是哪一份,又怎么知道有没有更新的取代它呢?

(E) The availability of the information needed for the action proposed is not clear to us, we can NOT say it is unavaialible for sure, mostly it's on case by case.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-3 03:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部