ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking," permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2525|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG100

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-4-1 01:39:00 | 只看该作者

OG100

100. One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices. >>


>>


Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:>>


>>


A.     Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.>>


B.     Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.


C.    Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that they find outside their own industry.


D.    Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.


E.     Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practice that take advantage of the special circumstances of their product or markets.


i wanna know what the blue section mean?


and answer is E , thank u.


沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-3 12:53:00 | 只看该作者
who can help me?
板凳
发表于 2007-7-29 09:10:00 | 只看该作者

有谁可以解释一下问题的意思吗?


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-29 9:20:25编辑过]
地板
发表于 2007-8-11 00:31:00 | 只看该作者

有没有人可以帮帮我们啊!我没有读懂题目的意思!

5#
发表于 2007-8-11 00:50:00 | 只看该作者

我试着解释一下,目的是抛砖引玉

 benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which is not in competition rather than against competitors
    

把非竞争企业作为基准优于把竞争企业作为基准

companies with which is not in competition rather than (companies with which is) against competitors.

6#
发表于 2007-8-12 18:16:00 | 只看该作者

把公司的业绩与非竞争者相比,而不与竞争者相比

benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which is not in competition rather than against competitors
  

benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which is not in competition rather than against companies with which is in competiton.


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-12 18:16:57编辑过]
7#
发表于 2008-8-9 23:15:00 | 只看该作者
benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which is not in competition
        rather than
        against
        
competitors
  
- 2个against平行,由rather than连接
- 基准 not in competition(非竞争对手),而非competitors(竞争对手)
- 问EXCEPT,即:以下合理解释“基准竞争对手,而不是基准竞争对手”的选项,除了:
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-3 15:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部