ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (TWDV)

00:00:00

To prevent some conflicts of interest, Congress could prohibit high-level government officials from accepting positions as lobbyists for three years after such officials leave government service. One such official concluded, however, that such a prohibition would be unfortunate because it would prevent high-level government officials from earning a livelihood for three years.

The official's conclusion logically depends on which of the following assumptions?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1899|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

help OG-8 !!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-3-4 13:04:00 | 只看该作者

help OG-8 !!!

8. To prevent some conflicts of interest, Congress could prohibit high-level government officials from accepting positions as lobbyists for three years after such officials leave government service. One such official concluded, however, that such a prohibition would be unfortunate because it would prevent high-level government officials from earning a livelihood for three years.
The official’s conclusion logically depends on which of the following assumptions?
A. Laws should not restrict the behavior of former government officials.
B. Lobbyists are typically people who have previously been high-level government officials.
C. Low-level government officials do not often become lobbyists when they leave government service.
D. High-level government officials who leave government service are capable of earning a livelihood only as lobbyists.
E. High-level government officials who leave government service are currently permitted to act as lobbyists for only three years.


The official’s argument does not depend on the assumption in B, since the argument would not be invalidated if
lobbyists were not typically former high-level government officials.


B 选项 是不是和解释矛盾????? 怎样去理解这个解释??? 谢谢

沙发
发表于 2006-3-4 22:56:00 | 只看该作者
OG的解释是说,假设B不正确,argument仍然成立,所以说明B不是argument的assumption。
板凳
发表于 2006-3-12 11:51:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用woainimen在2006-3-4 13:04:00的发言:

8. To prevent some conflicts of interest, Congress could prohibit high-level government officials from accepting positions as lobbyists for three years after such officials leave government service. One such official concluded, however, that such a prohibition would be unfortunate because it would prevent high-level government officials from earning a livelihood for three years.
The official’s conclusion logically depends on which of the following assumptions?
A. Laws should not restrict the behavior of former government officials.
B. Lobbyists are typically people who have previously been high-level government officials.
C. Low-level government officials do not often become lobbyists when they leave government service.
D. High-level government officials who leave government service are capable of earning a livelihood only as lobbyists.
E. High-level government officials who leave government service are currently permitted to act as lobbyists for only three years.


The official’s argument does not depend on the assumption in B, since the argument would not be invalidated if
lobbyists were not typically former high-level government officials.


B 选项 是不是和解释矛盾????? 怎样去理解这个解释??? 谢谢


我是这么理解的:从prohibit high-level government officials from accepting positions as lobbyists看,文章关注的是被雇佣为lobbyists的officials,而B说lobbyists就一定是officials.显然没有什么关系啊。换句话说,文章只跟你讨论lobbists中以前是officials的人,其他人不管,更管不着pobbyists是不是全都是officials,不是又怎么样,文章的reasoning没有要求必须是officials,讨论才能进行下去嘛。其实就是B错误的定位了讨论的范围。

你没晕吧?我好像自己都说不清楚了……

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-19 10:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部