ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (PVSU)

00:00:00

Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing the national park system, which is now run by the government.

Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2188|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于OG逻辑31题的新问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-2-7 10:14:00 | 只看该作者

关于OG逻辑31题的新问题

31. Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing the national park system, which is now run by the government.


Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?



A. Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership.


B. Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve conservation objectives.


C. If they wished to extend the park system, the private environmental groups might have to seek contributions from major donors and general public.


D. There might be competition among private environmental groups for control of certain park areas.


E. Some endangered species, such as the California condor, might die out despite the best efforts of the private environmental groups, even if those groups are not hampered by insufficient resources.



我有一点想不通,书上的正确答案为什么要用might这种可能性的语气,这样难道不会让人觉得那些人可能会也可能不会那样做,这样就不一定能削弱结论了吗


请教,谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2006-2-7 23:11:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用OWEN0410在2006-2-7 10:14:00的发言:

31. Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing the national park system, which is now run by the government.


Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?



A. Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership.


B. Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve conservation objectives.


C. If they wished to extend the park system, the private environmental groups might have to seek contributions from major donors and general public.


D. There might be competition among private environmental groups for control of certain park areas.


E. Some endangered species, such as the California condor, might die out despite the best efforts of the private environmental groups, even if those groups are not hampered by insufficient resources.



我有一点想不通,书上的正确答案为什么要用might这种可能性的语气,这样难道不会让人觉得那些人可能会也可能不会那样做,这样就不一定能削弱结论了吗


请教,谢谢!


答案是A吗?

个人觉得那个B并不能削弱。

板凳
发表于 2006-2-8 05:05:00 | 只看该作者

这个might在这里是说这些人可能会如何如何.如果他们**了.就会有问题.


这不正是削弱原文么

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-2-9 00:39:00 | 只看该作者

答案是A.


楼上的,你也说是可能了,那如果他们没有那样做,那就削弱不了了吧.


B个人觉得既不能削弱也不能支持结论。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 03:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部