ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: seasnow
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]OG11th-105

[复制链接]
41#
发表于 2006-12-23 04:20:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用叽里咕噜在2006-10-27 0:04:00的发言:

我印象中,好几个大N说过,X of Y, which...里面的which并不是固定地修饰X或者Y, 而是两者都有可能,要根据具体句子逻辑意思判断。有待继续探讨~

这句话的问题是 你怎么判断它的可能呢?

既然从语法上说 x y都是有可能的 那就是歧义 so wrong....

42#
发表于 2006-12-23 10:21:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用seasnow在2006-1-23 6:34:00的发言:

105.  Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission

(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,

(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,

选E?

E肯定不可以选,A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants
                and
has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,

and 的平行结构,但是 was orignally developed 是被动,而has the ability to ...是主动,所以不可以构成平行结构。

43#
发表于 2007-4-7 19:07:00 | 只看该作者
which修饰emission 逻辑上讲得通啊 called就不对了
44#
发表于 2007-4-11 11:35:00 | 只看该作者

再问一下

which从句为什么A中的which是对的,修饰technology,而C中的which就是错的,修饰了emission??,什么样的情况下可以跳跃修饰呢

请NN解惑!

45#
发表于 2007-4-29 16:43:00 | 只看该作者
同问!
46#
发表于 2007-5-23 20:18:00 | 只看该作者
同问
47#
发表于 2007-7-24 23:20:00 | 只看该作者
好象一直没有正解阿,顶一下,希望能有NN帮忙
48#
发表于 2007-7-31 19:14:00 | 只看该作者

这个疑问还是一直没有得到很好的答复呢。顶一下。

49#
发表于 2007-8-9 00:51:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用s7s7在2007-6-10 9:57:00的发言:
是因为A的called proton-induced x-ray emission紧接着主语,没有逗号,所以which就只能修饰technique,而如果called proton-induced x-ray emission前加有逗号,与主语分开,那which只好修饰就近的emission
        

see this link

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&replyID=2379865&id=255026&skin=0

50#
发表于 2007-8-9 01:07:00 | 只看该作者
个人认为A是不对的,因为which 是就近指代emission.这是OG对SC说明时指出的。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 07:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部