[讨论]OG11th-104

livary

以下是引用香香茶在2006-4-16 11:02:00的发言：

The comma following bombs is paired with the comma following apart, and this comma pair sets off the participial phrase introduced by merging.

这句话如何理解？

这个问题我也不明白, 哪位大侠能够解答呢? 谢谢!

livary

拜求高手。。。

snowfield

The comma following bombs is paired with the comma following apart, and this comma pair sets off the participial phrase introduced by merging.

就是说：bombs之后的逗号和apart之后的逗号组成一对，这对逗号将merging引导的分词短语（与句子其他部分）分开。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-27 12:47:01编辑过]

snowfield

以下是引用v521在2006-1-23 12:35:00的发言：

1.        C正确的话，就表明C中的do是指代slipt。也就是do首先指代前面最近的动词形式的原形。

例如：

Fusion, the process that fuels the sun, is the holy grail of nuclear energy. It smashes together atoms to release energy, rather than splitting them apart as modern fission reactors do.（引自网络文章）

2. E错按照OG的说法：(1)merge应该是现在分词作power的伴随，而不是另一个和power平行的动作。(2)unlike作状语放句未，不是ETS喜欢的形式，一般是放句首或是所要修饰的动词的前头。

同意你总结的第一点，你的例子也很好。但第二点中从何处判断：merge是power的伴随，而不是作为分词短语修饰that/force/nuclear fusion? 本题中将nuclear reactor做对比是在让人费解，找不到合适的对比对象。如果假设c对，nuclear reactor似乎是与that（that power)对应。而且主句说nuclear fussion is a force本身就让人觉得挺怪异的，nuclear fussion是一个过程怎么能直接等同于force呢？觉得本题中用平行来排除没有说服力。

另在D选项的解释中说：punctuation makes clear this separate action cannot be the case如何理解？

D：and merges the nuclei of atoms but does not split them apart, as is done in nuclear reactors.

欢迎讨论。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-27 13:03:56编辑过]

zjlssw

我觉得这题目前存在的问题关键是OG对标点的解读该如何理解：

The comma following bombs is paired with the comma following apart, and this comma pair sets off the participial phrase introduced by merging.

D. Illogical and awkward construction attempts to make
        merges the second verb of the restrictive clause parallel to powers and does not split, punctuation makes clear this separate action cannot be the case; as is done is awkward and wordy

这两句话是遵循什么样的语法规律的呢？请知道的朋友指教，谢谢

Dinaxie

104. Nuclear fusion is the force that powers the Sun, the stars, and hydrogen bombs, merging the nuclei of atoms and not splitting them apart, as in nuclear reactors.

(A) merging the nuclei of atoms and not splitting them apart, as in nuclear reactors

(B) merging the nuclei of atoms instead of splitting them apart, like nuclear reactors

(C) merging the nuclei of atoms rather than splitting them apart, as nuclear reactors do

(D) and merges the nuclei of atoms but does not split them apart, as is done in unclear reactors

(E) and merges the nuclei of atoms, unlike atomic reactors that split them apart

B中like nuclear reactors放在句尾，修饰哪个部分，放在句尾和放在句首有区别吗？

C中as nuclear reactors do又修饰哪个部分，可以这么理解吗：Nuclear fusion is the force that ...，as nuclear reactors do，那么do是不是和is对应？

为什么OG对B的解释：here the basis of comparasion is unclear, and the usage is incorrect

peterchang

以下是引用zjlssw在2006-6-28 10:44:00的发言：

我觉得这题目前存在的问题关键是OG对标点的解读该如何理解：

The comma following bombs is paired with the comma following apart, and this comma pair sets off the participial phrase introduced by merging.

D. Illogical and awkward construction attempts to make
  merges the second verb of the restrictive clause parallel to powers and does not split, punctuation makes clear this separate action cannot be the case; as is done is awkward and wordy

这两句话是遵循什么样的语法规律的呢？请知道的朋友指教，谢谢

我也对此不大了解

jchen924

以下是引用snowfield在2006-6-27 12:46:00的发言：

同意你总结的第一点，你的例子也很好。但第二点中从何处判断：merge是power的伴随，而不是作为分词短语修饰that/force/nuclear fusion? 本题中将nuclear reactor做对比是在让人费解，找不到合适的对比对象。如果假设c对，nuclear reactor似乎是与that（that power)对应。而且主句说nuclear fussion is a force本身就让人觉得挺怪异的，nuclear fussion是一个过程怎么能直接等同于force呢？觉得本题中用平行来排除没有说服力。

另在D选项的解释中说：punctuation makes clear this separate action cannot be the case如何理解？

D：and merges the nuclei of atoms but does not split them apart, as is done in nuclear reactors.

欢迎讨论。

关于第一点，有些困惑。

从语法上说，既然逗号已经把merging分词短语与主句独立了，那么应该可以拿掉，变成：Nuclear fusion is the force that powers the Sun, the stars, and hydrogen bombs as nuclear reactors do. 由此，do应该指代power这个动词。

从逻辑上说，do应该指split，因为nuclear reactor多指裂变的核反应堆，所以只能是指split the atoms apart。太阳和氢弹的原理是核聚变。

到底哪一个更对？thx

行缘

我也觉得困惑：

先说说我对OG11解释的理解:

The comma following bombs is paired with the comma following apart, and this comma pair sets off the participial phrase introduced by merging

我的理解是: 这l两个comma是一对，中间是分词短语；

attemps to make merges
            the second verb of the restrictive clause parallel to powers and does not split, punctuation makes clear this separate action cannot be the case;

我的理解：D试图使merge成为that引导的从句的第二个谓语动词,从而与powers并列，但标点明显的表明不是这回事儿。此句中，clear提前，即make (this...case) clear.

我的问题来了：

1)如果C对：as nuclear reators do 从句子的意思讲是应该修饰splitting的，但有一下问题:

按我对OG11的理解，这对comma语法上应该可以，那样as nuclear reators do的do就指代powers了，应该是说不通的。

我认为如果C要正确，应该将第二个comma去掉，或加在rather than之前。

行缘

2)如果E正确，那么powers就和merges并列了，但我认为他们确实不改并列，一个是动作(结果)，Power; 另一个是原理(解释/伴随),merge.不应并列。

供讨论。