GWD-4-Q14

smocky

这道题当初是用“排除法”做出来的。但是正确答案D，我没想明白。请教一下NN。 多谢了。

GWD-4-Q14:

GWD-5-Q2:

Guidebook writer:  I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those hotels built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry木工工作work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.  Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?

The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structuress, such as houses and stores.

Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.

The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse, and be demolished

The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.

[D]

bluevironika

指南作者从1930年前所建饭店的木制品的现存质量好，得出了1930年前的木匠更好的结论。

问我们削弱项。

这里有个aummption就是，比较基础问题: 人们对这些木制品的使用频度是相同的。

d就削弱了这个项目，说，正是因为质量好，才被过度使用的那些才是真正质量好的。

这个题目的思路跟og上面关于草地放牧的思路很像。

请指教。

lawyer_1

D的意思为木工质量不好的早被拆掉啦，现在作者看到的基本上是木工质量好的。而93后的那些，因为离现在近，多数还在。这就是作者看到的93年前的宾馆木工质量整体上还好的原因。

PositiveMind

为何b不对，难道我又犯了主观想象的错误？

gmat离我还很远。。。

bluevironika

楼上的哥哥好，b说的是

Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

30年代以来的饭店通常住进了更多的客人。

这个题目讨论的是木工活的质量问题，跟入住率没有关系的。你觉得b对，是你自己觉得住的人多了，所以就坏了，但是这还是不能说明是30年后的木工质量好；木工质量好跟住的人多是有个gap的~

sandyno0425

１１