大全162，OG11-102，答案解释不懂，请教

biss33

翻出以前的帖子了http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=168163&id=23250&page=1&skin=0&Star=2

第12楼，有关于e指代的讲解

jchen924

请问,carefully coordinated them with her narratives 这样的分词短语到底是修饰什么的呢?

按常理,逗号后的分词短语的逻辑主语应该是主句的主语,BP

但是,在b选项的解释中,说这个短语illogically modifies the noun that immediately precedes it (book illustrations)。说明这个分词短语就近修饰了前面的名词？

怎么解释呢？

多谢！

hyh_0927

D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations

請問為什麼D不對?

Carefully coordinated with her narratives 本來的主詞是Beatrix Potter嗎?

kky

 coordinated的对象应该是book illustrations, 而非bp

ll_422

UP一下

pangpangshin

以下是引用gonghao在2006-5-19 13:18:00的发言：

carefully coordinated them with her narratives

分词修饰前有逗号的话，其主语等于句子的逻辑主语，在这里就是BP（人名），这样的话就变成

BP carefully coordinated them with her narratives

这样的话，them没有指代对象，也就无法指代in。。。。。的书了

同意

aoteman

分词短语的逻辑主语怎么判断？按道理是主句主语，但是现在og说就近修饰。还有有人说，现在分词在句前和句尾逻辑主语是主句主语，而在句中就近修饰，这个说法对不对？而过去分词短语呢？是不是不符合这个规则，要不e的解释就不对了。

比较晕。有没有那个nn能够系统清晰的剖析一下。thanks a lot.

Landsky

up

罗马青年

为什么OG解释：

对于A，B中出现的 “in her book illustrations，carefully coordinating。。。”解释说分词就近修饰逗号前的illustrations，修饰歧义；

但到了E中，“in her book illustrations，carefully coordinated。。。”

，斑竹解释说coordinated 跳跃修饰介词结构前的主语BP了？

状况类似，都是分词修饰，为什么一个就近修饰，一个跳跃修饰？

文明

102. Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
                coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.

(A)       Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,

(B)       In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter

(C)       In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter

(D)       Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations

(E)        Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and

Logical predication + Rhetorical construction

This sentence awkwardly presents two phrases intended to modify Beatrix Potter and loses the clarity and logic of the meaning. In the original sentence, these modifiers sound choppy and create too much separation between the subject, Beatrix Potter, and the verb capitalized. Beginning the sentence with
                in her book illustrations and following that phrase with the relative clause which she carefully coordinated with her narratives allows the subject, Beatrix Potter, to be united with the verb, capitalized, for a stronger main clause.

A       The modifying elements are poorly placed and leave the subject too far from the verb

B       Phrase carefully coordinating ... illogically modifies the noun that immediately precedes it
                (book illustrations); Potter, not the illustrations, did the coordinating; awkward and unclear

C       Correct. The correct placement of the modifying elements makes this sentence easier to understand; the use of which clearly links the two elements.

D         Carefully coordinated ... absurdly modifies Beatrix Potter rather than her illustrations

Them cannot refer to book illustrations because the plural noun is the object of the preposition in;
            the relationships among the parts of the sentence are unclear

以下是偶学OG到现在的理解，主要针对大家讨论的分词结构处在不同位置所修饰的对象和逻辑关系，参与讨论就是为了提高水平！请指正：

1、（B）【介词结构】，【分词结构】，主句——————这里的分词结构是插入语，只能向前修饰，因此OG11注释说是修饰最靠近它的前面的名词；

2、（D）【分词结构】，【主句主语】，【介词结构】——这里的分词结构是大家比较熟悉的，其修饰的对象及其逻辑主语就是主句主语，但是因为用了过去分词，有表被动的含义，所以逻辑意思错（正确的应该是：coordinate的主词是B.P.，受词是illustraions，所以只能用现在分词形式，如C）；

3、（E）【主句主语】，【介词结构】，【分词结构】——这里的介词结构是插入语，也就是说可以抽离句子，并且不会对句子造成任何逻辑关系（包括指代）或者整体结构有任何影响的，所以，后面的分词结构不能指代这个作为插入语的介词结构的东西，于是then就没有指代对象。

关于插入语跟修饰与被修饰或者指代等的问题，携隐妹妹也有提及过的，大家看看牛牛的总结会精准很多，偶就在这里献丑啦。