ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: howardwang
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd17-14,答案是否值得商榷?

[复制链接]
41#
发表于 2007-6-8 18:06:00 | 只看该作者
up
42#
发表于 2007-7-6 09:45:00 | 只看该作者
kan
43#
发表于 2007-7-10 15:30:00 | 只看该作者

顶一下

44#
发表于 2007-9-10 16:15:00 | 只看该作者

这个ONE DAY也是当初犹豫半天最后选择A的理由。。。

45#
发表于 2007-11-29 16:34:00 | 只看该作者
up
46#
发表于 2008-2-17 18:47:00 | 只看该作者
真麻煩,現在看討論要發言才能用捲軸
47#
发表于 2008-4-4 11:16:00 | 只看该作者

B是答案没错啊

就在那个one day位置

A 中的one day 修饰不清,可修饰complete 也可修饰may be

B 就很好啦,completing 作形容词,one day 修饰may be

最后半句话的意思是,那些竞争的公司有一天也许会变成伙伴(很清楚)

48#
发表于 2008-4-6 00:18:00 | 只看该作者

最主要的是A中的they指代不明

而B中的they从语法上来说指代lines 而逻辑上也是指代lines

49#
发表于 2008-5-21 23:30:00 | 只看该作者
up
50#
发表于 2008-6-13 17:57:00 | 只看该作者

这题我选A,对了答案和前面几则讨论一度屈服于B,后来还是句意为上,选A

理由不是whereas比although好,或是in the more stablished industries优于in industries that are more established,

因为其实这些严格来讲应该都不算是什么大错误,只是我们自己猜测ETS的喜好,说不准的,

还是看句意吧

14. GWD17-Q14:

Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete
                one day may be partners the next.

 

A.      Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete

B.       Although the lines of competition are clearly defined in industries that are more established, they are blurred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as competing companies

C.      The lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, unlike the Internet where they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete

D.      Unlike more established industries, where the lines of competition are clearly defined, they are burred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as companies that compete

E.       Unlike more established industries, with clearly defined lines of competition, those of the Internet industry are blurred and indistinct, as competing companies

C/D/E就不说了,用unlike就可排除,主要比较A/B

我想B最主要的错误在于 as competing companies one day may be partners the next -->这句这样讲逻辑是不通的,

as competing companies one day may be partners the next? 这句话没办法表达出原本 '互相竞争' 的公司后来变成伙伴关系

companies that compete one day may be partners the next 句意才通

one day跟the next可以呼应 compete跟be partners互应
        

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 01:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部