ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1145|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全sectin2--5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-12-3 21:48:00 | 只看该作者

大全sectin2--5

请大家看这个题目:


The city’s public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.


The statements above best support the conclusion that


(A) the private firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry


(B) political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs


(C) private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs


(D) the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firm


(E) the municipal government would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs



答案:B



怎么看得我一片迷糊啊?B和题目之间的逻辑关系是怎么样的呢?


盼望牛牛解答。


沙发
发表于 2005-12-3 22:07:00 | 只看该作者

题目说的是the municipal government finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service即因为政治原因所以入不敷出,但又说如果public transportation were handled by a private firm就不会有问题。


所以结论就是private firm不会受政治影响,也就是B说的。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-12-3 22:22:00 | 只看该作者

呵呵,谢谢解答。


看了解答一下子明白过来了。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 17:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部