以下是引用higeo在2007-5-23 1:16:00的发言:the argument: in the plan, drivers absorbs the cost...... receive no benefit... (C) drivers receive benfit...... from income tax revenues...... (C) set us up by the word "benefit", but...in (C), drivers benefit from income tax rather than benefit from the plan. For given no clear relationship or suggestion between income tax and the plan, (C) is irrelevant. very good catch! C is totally irrelevant to the Plan in question! 如果没有发现higeo所说的,也可以这样理解,C是说开车的所享受的大桥的维修费,开车的和不开车的都要出。这样显然还是不公平。 原文的推理是 因为 开车的没有好处,所以 计划不公平 C是想直接weaken结论。但是未遂。 D是直接weaken前提,有好处。遂。
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-6-25 23:49:15编辑过] |