ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1309|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新问GWD4-23

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-21 13:25:00 | 只看该作者

新问GWD4-23

没有找到以前相关的讨论.现提问


Q22 to Q25:
      Many managers are influenced by
dangerous myths about pay that lead
to counterproductive decisions about
Line how their companies compensate
  (5) employees.  One such myth is that
labor rates, the rate per hour paid to
workers, are identical with labor costs,
the money spent on labor in relation to
the productivity of the labor force.
(10) This myth leads to the assumption that
a company can simply lower its labor
costs by cutting wages.  But labor
costs and labor rates are not in fact
the same:  one company could pay
(15) its workers considerably more than
another and yet have lower labor
costs if that company's productivity
were higher due to the talent of its
workforce, the efficiency of its work
(20) processes, or other factors.  The
confusion of costs with rates per-
sists partly because labor rates are
a convenient target for managers who
want to make an impact on their com-
(25) pany's budgets.  Because labor rates
are highly visible, managers can easily
compare their company's rates with
those of competitors.  Furthermore,
labor rates often appear to be a
(30) company's most malleable financial
variable:  cutting wages appears an
easier way to control costs than such
options as reconfiguring work pro-
cesses or altering product design.
(35)        The myth that labor rates and labor
costs are equivalent is supported by
business journalists, who frequently
confound the two.  For example, prom-
inent business journals often remark on
(40) the "high" cost of German labor, citing
as evidence the average amount paid
to German workers.
  The myth is also
perpetuated by the compensation-
consulting industry, which has its own
(45) incentives to keep such myths alive.
First, although some of these con-
sulting firms have recently broadened
their practices beyond the area of
compensation, their mainstay con-
(50) tinues to be advising companies on
changing their compensation prac-
tices.  Suggesting that a company's
performance can be improved in
some other way than by altering its
(55) pay system may be empirically cor-
rect but contrary to the consultants'
interests.  Furthermore, changes
to the compensation system may
appear to be simpler to implement
(60) than changes to other aspects of an
organization, so managers are more
likely to find such advice from con-
sultants palatable.  Finally, to the
extant that changes in compensation
(65) create new problems, the consultants
will continue to have work solving the
problems that result from their advice





The author of the passage mentions business journals (line 39) primarily in order to


              



  • demonstrate how a particular kind of evidence can be used to support two different conclusions

  • cast doubt on a particular view about the average amount paid to German workers

  • suggest that business journalists may have a vested interest in perpetuating a particular view

  • identify one source of support for a view common among business managers

  • indicate a way in which a particular myth could be dispelled

  • 为什么选D? C有什么不对? 



    for example前面说,journalists把labor rates和labor costs看作是一样的,经常混淆两者.for example后就是用例子证明这个观点的呀.不就是C的说法吗? D中:a view 指的是什么?黄体字部分也没有提到business manager呀.



    请指教. 




    沙发
     楼主| 发表于 2005-11-21 19:15:00 | 只看该作者
    自己顶.
    板凳
    发表于 2005-12-14 20:44:00 | 只看该作者

    It is "in order to ",don't ask the detail

    地板
    发表于 2005-12-18 02:55:00 | 只看该作者

    这个题我也选e,答案是d


    d我怎么看也不对阿identify one source of support for a view common among business managers。 文中说的是


    so managers are more likely to find such advice from con-


    sultants palatable. 说明business managers 得source 是consulting company 阿,跟 jurnalist 有什么关系呢??


    请指点


    5#
    发表于 2006-1-8 16:52:00 | 只看该作者
    搂主和四楼的mm一个近了,一个远了,都没有中靶。三楼mm说的不错,不要管细节。 文章说下面讲几种助长这种神话的东东, 一个是记者, 在一个是咨询公司。所以就就就。。。。。。
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-8 14:25
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部