ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do. Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1234|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD- 29-19寻求解题思路

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-10 18:24:00 | 只看该作者

GWD- 29-19寻求解题思路



























Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do.  Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?












Some companies place employees who are being treated for drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid sick leave.





Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.





Workers who would permanently lose their jobs if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible





People who hold safety-sensitive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.





Some industrial accidents are caused by equipment failure rather than by employee error.
沙发
发表于 2005-11-10 20:52:00 | 只看该作者

哪里来的gwd29?!!!


the answer is C.


原文说:酗酒的人在安全敏感的岗位上,工厂事故就多。即使经过治疗,酗酒的人仍然比其他人更容易喝酒。结论:为了减少事故,应当禁止经过drinking治疗的人在安全岗位上。


答案,如果喝酒的人去治疗则会永久失去工作,因此他们会掩盖这个事实,而保证更久的工作。[隐含:会导致工厂事故更多]

板凳
发表于 2005-11-11 00:03:00 | 只看该作者

支持C

地板
发表于 2005-11-11 02:31:00 | 只看该作者

C is right

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-11-11 08:49:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢2楼。是不是答案C可以这么理解:Worker(定语:对饮酒问题有治疗的工人<如果老板发现>将永久的开除他们-这些工人)尝试着隐藏他们饮酒这个事实,尽可能的长时间留在工作职位上<因他们经常饮酒,所以可能导致事故>。

6#
发表于 2005-11-11 10:16:00 | 只看该作者
对。
7#
发表于 2005-11-14 10:50:00 | 只看该作者
肯定是C
返回列表 发新帖
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: GMAT考试

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-16 04:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部