ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: Ysandre
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day72

  [复制链接]
11#
发表于 2022-11-30 11:16:55 发自手机 Web 版 | 只看该作者
看一下
12#
发表于 2022-11-30 11:18:50 | 只看该作者
Day 72
1.        在河边种树
In the arid land along the Colorado River, use of the river's water supply is strictly controlled:farms along the river each have a limited allocation that they are allowed to use for irrigation.But the trees that grow in narrow strips along the river's banks also use its water.Clearly, therefore, if farmers were to remove those trees, more water would be available for crop irrigation.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A.The trees along the river's banks shelter it from the sun and wind, thereby greatly reducing the amount of water lost through evaporation.
B.Owners of farms along the river will probably not undertake the expense of cutting down trees along the banks unless they are granted a greater allocation of water in return.【跟花费无关】
C.Many of the tree species currently found along the river's banks are specifically adapted to growing in places where tree roots remain constantly wet.【树容易长在什么环境也没关系】
D.The strip of land where trees grow along the river's banks would not be suitable for growing crops if the trees were removed.【有点道理诶】
E.The distribution of water allocations for irrigation is intended to prevent farms farther upstream from using water needed by farms farther downstream.【没提到树的作用】
P:河水紧缺,又要农用,又要灌树
C:农民把树移走了,农用水就更多了
思路:削弱
方向:指出树的不可代替性,如果树移走了,就会破坏啥生态结构,水也会变少,情况更糟糕
答案:A

2.        辞职的主管
department head. a lot of department heads would retire while the number of qualified person for new head is only half of the posts, which results in the shortage of heads. Many departments of the company will have no head for the company,since...
P:只要部门里能提供给主管的人才没有一半的话,部门的主管就会辞职
C:很多公司的主管将会没有主管
Q:求原因
思路:肯定是跟人才有关
方向:因为现在人才紧缺啊,或者是公司的什么政策导致很多人才辞职或者跳槽吧
【答案是:因为公司不会改变雇佣新主管的计划】

3.        没钱修路的政府
A government plans to develop new road, but doesn't have the money. So the government will let a private company to take on the task and develop a new tollway. Oppose: the government let the private company make too much money by collecting toll fees.
Q: What weaken the opponent's argument?
F:政府想修路但没钱
P:所以让私营企业修,修好了还收费
C:反对者说政府这样就让私营企业收过路费大赚特赚了
思路:反驳反对者,or赞成政府
方向:政府要出台政策也会抑制私营的动作,不可能让他们一直赚下去,要赚也是政府赚
【答案正是,政府规定只让私营企业收取过路费直到收回成本为止】
13#
发表于 2022-11-30 11:27:42 | 只看该作者
同意!               
14#
发表于 2022-11-30 11:31:46 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
15#
发表于 2022-11-30 11:33:43 发自手机 Web 版 | 只看该作者
謝謝分享
16#
发表于 2022-11-30 11:35:48 | 只看该作者
Day 72
1.        在河边种树
In the arid land along the Colorado River, use of the river's water supply is strictly controlled:farms along the river each have a limited allocation that they are allowed to use for irrigation.But the trees that grow in narrow strips along the river's banks also use its water.Clearly, therefore, if farmers were to remove those trees, more water would be available for crop irrigation.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A.The trees along the river's banks shelter it from the sun and wind, thereby greatly reducing the amount of water lost through evaporation.
B.Owners of farms along the river will probably not undertake the expense of cutting down trees along the banks unless they are granted a greater allocation of water in return.
C.Many of the tree species currently found along the river's banks are specifically adapted to growing in places where tree roots remain constantly wet.
D.The strip of land where trees grow along the river's banks would not be suitable for growing crops if the trees were removed.
E.The distribution of water allocations for irrigation is intended to prevent farms farther upstream from using water needed by farms farther downstream.
AAAAAAA

2.        辞职的主管
department head. a lot of department heads would retire while the number of qualified person for new head is only half of the posts, which results in the shortage of heads. Many departments of the company will have no head for the company,since...
公司不会改变原有的计划
3.        没钱修路的政府
A government plans to develop new road, but doesn't have the money. So the government will let a private company to take on the task and develop a new tollway. Oppose: the government let the private company make too much money by collecting toll fees. 
Q: What weaken the opponent's argument?
GAP:让私人修路vs私人通过路收过多过路费
W:只让私人收费到满足成本为止
17#
发表于 2022-11-30 11:52:24 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
18#
发表于 2022-11-30 12:01:41 发自手机 Web 版 | 只看该作者
19#
发表于 2022-11-30 12:20:02 | 只看该作者
1.        在河边种树
In the arid land along the Colorado River, use of the river's water supply is strictly controlledfarms along the river each have a limited allocation that they are allowed to use for irrigation.But the trees that grow in narrow strips along the river's banks also use its water.Clearly, therefore, if farmers were to remove those trees, more water would be available for crop irrigation.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A.The trees along the river's banks shelter it from the sun and wind, thereby greatly reducing the amount of water lost through evaporation.
B.Owners of farms along the river will probably not undertake the expense of cutting down trees along the banks unless they are granted a greater allocation of water in return.
C.Many of the tree species currently found along the river's banks are specifically adapted to growing in places where tree roots remain constantly wet.
D.The strip of land where trees grow along the river's banks would not be suitable for growing crops if the trees were removed.
E.The distribution of water allocations for irrigation is intended to prevent farms farther upstream from using water needed by farms farther downstream.
A
2.        辞职的主管
department head. a lot of department heads would retire while the number of qualified person for new head is only half of the posts, which results in the shortage of heads. Many departments of the company will have no head for the companysince...
公司不会改变退休的计划
3.        没钱修路的政府
A government plans to develop new road, but doesn't have the money. So the government will let a private company to take on the task and develop a new tollway. Oppose: the government let the private company make too much money by collecting toll fees.
Q: What weaken the opponent's argument?
规定只让私人公司赚到成本就可以
20#
发表于 2022-11-30 12:21:30 发自手机 Web 版 | 只看该作者
看一下!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-20 02:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部