[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day68

PBkk

看一下！               

PBkk

Day 68
1.        地产商vs代表
一个senate代表说，针对最新出台的一个针对building faulty的限制法案，很多的地产商威胁民众不要去支持这个法案，否则地产商会推出市场退出这个地区。代表呼吁民众不要去理睬这一个威胁，就像我们会像lobby group 提出一些common sense的限制，也受到这种威胁，但是departure从来没有发生过。问assumption.


Support：类比：民众支持的法案是common sense的限制，因此威胁不会奏效。

2.        Must be True
机场小偷的问题，说insurance claims是千分之一，机场安保标准是1.5%以下都没有问题，认为是安全之类的，——然后我好像选的是小件行李被偷了也没有向保险公司claim，反正就是说明了那个按照保险公司claim的比例偏低了（这道题好像是weaken哦~~
题目不懂


3.        事故率高的山路
Many small roads do not have painted markings along their edges. Clear edge markings would make it easier for drivers to see upcoming curves and to judge the car's position on the road, particularly when visibility is poor, and would therefore seem to be a useful contribution to road safety. However, after Greatwater County painted edge markings on all its narrow, winding roads, the annual accident rate along those roads actually increased slightly.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the increase in accident rate?
(A) Greatwater County has an unusually high proportion of narrow, winding roads.
(B) In bad weather it can be nearly as difficult for drivers to see the road as it is at night.
(C) Prior to the painting of the edge markings, Greatwater County's narrow, winding roads already had a somewhat higher accident rate than other Greatwater County roads.
(D) Many of the accidents on narrow, winding roads involve a single vehicle veering off the road, rather than the collision of two vehicles.
(E) After the markings were painted on the roads, many drivers who had gone out of their way to avoid driving on those roads at night no longer did so.


E：直接解释因果

brownie1101

看一下！               

Severus.

看一下！               

brownie1101

1.        地产商vs代表
一个senate代表说，针对最新出台的一个针对building faulty的限制法案，很多的地产商威胁民众不要去支持这个法案，否则地产商会推出市场退出这个地区。代表呼吁民众不要去理睬这一个威胁，就像我们会像lobby group 提出一些common sense的限制，也受到这种威胁，但是departure从来没有发生过。问assumption.

答：没咋看懂题意。看了解析说的是类比题目，以前lobby group成功过，那我们也可成功

2.        Must be True
机场小偷的问题，说insurance claims是千分之一，机场安保标准是1.5%以下都没有问题，认为是安全之类的，——然后我好像选的是小件行李被偷了也没有向保险公司claim，反正就是说明了那个按照保险公司claim的比例偏低了（这道题好像是weaken哦~~
答：有些人没有申诉，那么insurance claims就低了，但实际上发生率更高

3.        事故率高的山路
Many small roads do not have painted markings along their edges. Clear edge markings would make it easier for drivers to see upcoming curves and to judge the car's position on the road, particularly when visibility is poor, and would therefore seem to be a useful contribution to road safety. However, after Greatwater County painted edge markings on all its narrow, winding roads, the annual accident rate along those roads actually increased slightly.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the increase in accident rate?
(A) Greatwater County has an unusually high proportion of narrow, winding roads.
(B) In bad weather it can be nearly as difficult for drivers to see the road as it is at night.
(C) Prior to the painting of the edge markings, Greatwater County's narrow, winding roads already had a somewhat higher accident rate than other Greatwater County roads.
(D) Many of the accidents on narrow, winding roads involve a single vehicle veering off the road, rather than the collision of two vehicles.
(E) After the markings were painted on the roads, many drivers who had gone out of their way to avoid driving on those roads at night no longer did so
选E

Severus.

1.        地产商vs代表
一个senate代表说，针对最新出台的一个针对building faulty的限制法案，很多的地产商威胁民众不要去支持这个法案，否则地产商会推出市场退出这个地区。代表呼吁民众不要去理睬这一个威胁，就像我们会像lobby group 提出一些common sense的限制，也受到这种威胁，但是departure从来没有发生过。问assumption.
假设：地产商和lobby group 一样，可以类比。
向lobby group提出的common sense 的限制通过了
2.        Must be True
机场小偷的问题，说insurance claims是千分之一，机场安保标准是1.5%以下都没有问题，认为是安全之类的，——然后我好像选的是小件行李被偷了也没有向保险公司claim，反正就是说明了那个按照保险公司claim的比例偏低了（这道题好像是weaken哦~~
部分价值低的行李被偷没有找保险公司，数据不准确
3.        事故率高的山路
Many small roads do not have painted markings along their edges. Clear edge markings would make it easier for drivers to see upcoming curves and to judge the car's position on the road, particularly when visibility is poor, and would therefore seem to be a useful contribution to road safety. However, after Greatwater County painted edge markings on all its narrow, winding roads, the annual accident rate along those roads actually increased slightly.E

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the increase in accident rate?
(A) Greatwater County has an unusually high proportion of narrow, winding roads.
(B) In bad weather it can be nearly as difficult for drivers to see the road as it is at night.
(C) Prior to the painting of the edge markings, Greatwater County's narrow, winding roads already had a somewhat higher accident rate than other Greatwater County roads.
(D) Many of the accidents on narrow, winding roads involve a single vehicle veering off the road, rather than the collision of two vehicles.
(E) After the markings were painted on the roads, many drivers who had gone out of their way to avoid driving on those roads at night no longer did so
好东西为什么会坏，因为有副作用

Shell_liang

看一下！               

Shell_liang

Day 68
1.        地产商vs代表
一个senate代表说，针对最新出台的一个针对building faulty的限制法案，很多的地产商威胁民众不要去支持这个法案，否则地产商会推出市场退出这个地区。代表呼吁民众不要去理睬这一个威胁，就像我们会像lobby group 提出一些common sense的限制，也受到这种威胁，但是departure从来没有发生过。问assumption.

P--地产商威胁不要支持法案
C--代表：common sense会限制
这种lobby group提出限制是否能够让民众免于被威胁？曾经是否通过？
2.        Must be True
机场小偷的问题，说insurance claims是千分之一，机场安保标准是1.5%以下都没有问题，认为是安全之类的，——然后我好像选的是小件行李被偷了也没有向保险公司claim，反正就是说明了那个按照保险公司claim的比例偏低了（这道题好像是weaken哦~~

insurance claim是千分之一 --->机场安保标准1.5%
削弱？ 小件行李被偷了也没有向保险公司claim

统计的保险索赔率低--> 质疑数据的准确性 ---> 有人不会报案

3. 小路没有marking-->会导致道路不安全
G有了Marking，反而事故率还上升了
原因-- 上路的人多了
A-- G本身的小路多（无关）
B-- 坏天气 （无关）
C-- 本身事故发生率高-- 结论说increased，无助于解释
D-- 单轮车双轮车，文中没提到
E-- 很多避免走这个路的人开始走了

sesan

同意！               

RAISSA700

看一下！