揽瓜阁 逻辑做题小分队Day132

小白斩鸡

请大家在本帖回复：
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动，加微信号killgmat

Psychologist: In an experiment, an actor was introduced as an academic expert to an audience of professional educators and then gave a lecture that had been designed to sound academic but to be devoid of substance. However, the lecture was well delivered and full of interesting neologisms. Afterward, most audience members said the lecture was insightful and informative. This shows that the belief that someone is an expert predisposes people to accept whatever that person says.

To evaluate the strength of the psychologist's argument, it would be most helpful to conduct a similar experiment in which

(A) the same actor gave a similar lecture to the same audience, and afterward the audience members were asked to explain the substance of the lecture

(B) another actor delivered the same lecture in a similar manner to an audience that has been told that the lecture was designed to be devoid of substance

(C) another actor used a dull, awkward delivery to give a similar lecture to the same audience but was not introduced beforehand

(D) a real academic expert gave a more substantive lecture to the same audience

(E) the same actor gave the same lecture in the same way to a similar audience after having been introduced as a beginning student of the topic

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

All the information that high school students are required to learn is becoming available in an electric form that is accessible through computers. For this reason, some people have argued that traditional means of schooling are no longer necessary: students do not need a teacher as a repository of knowledge, but rather can seek out information themselves. There is little reason, however, to think that teachers will be replaced with computers any time soon, because________.

A Computers are much cost effective than teachers.

B Many teachers are becoming familiar with new computer technology and using it to increase their knowledge.

C When students seek out information unsupervised, they often do not seek out what they are required to learn.

D Students are often much more proficient than their teachers at using computers.

E Information accessible through computers is often much more up-to-date than that available through traditional sources such as text books.

参考答案：EC

大月亮cyn

Day132
1. E
有一个实验，一个演员假装自己是专家，讲一些看起来很学术但没什么实质的东西。但观众还是觉得他的内容很深奥。【结论】相信一个人是专家会让人接受他说的东西。找评估
A 找同样的演员给同一批观众讲类似的内容，然后让观众解释substance 题目关注点不是能不能解释出演讲内容的重点       
B 找另一个演员 多了变量，说明不了什么，有什么不同的实验结果都可以归咎于演员改变了       
C 同B 换一个演员就不行       
D 让一个真的专家来讲更substantive演讲 还是要死扣conclusion，结论无关是不是真的专家       
E 同样的演员，讲同样的内容给一群类似的观众，但是把演员介绍为初学者而不是专家，看观众的反应。√
2. C
高中生学的内容可以在网上学到了。因此传统教育没必要了：学生不需要老师，直接上网找信息就行。【观点】这个argument还太早下定论，因为：？
A 电脑cost effective？没有解释为什么需要老师       
B 老师也用电脑丰富知识。那学生直接用电脑不就完事了？不能解释还需要传统教育       
C 找一些unsupervised信息时，学生没办法找到他们需要学的内容。那就需要老师来指导√       
D 学生比老师用电脑更proficient 无法解释       
E 电脑上的信息会更与时俱静，还是支持新教育反对传统教育不选 文章是支持传统教育的       

斯麦尔糖

e'c

yjjy3712

bc

NCse

ec

zyycn

1、实验：演员被介绍成专家，然后发表并没有实质内容的演讲，但观众都表示演讲很有收获。结论：相信某人是专家就会让人相信他的话。问evaluate
思考：重点是相信某人是专家，那之前被介绍成是谁就很重要，没有太好的思路，直接看选项。

A：同一个演员对同一群观众发表类似的演说，然后让观众解释演说的实质内容是什么。那无论观众是否能解释，都不影响观众是否相信演员的话。
B：另一个演员发表类似的演说，但提前告诉观众这个演说没有实质内容。没说另一个演员被介绍成谁。
C：另一个演员对同一群观众发表类似的演说，但说得挺烂，也没提前告诉观众他是谁。没说介绍成谁。
D：真正地专家对同一群观众发表更有实质内容的演说。没说介绍成谁。
E：同一个演员对另一群观众发表相同演说，然后被介绍成学生。正确，其他条件不变，只是不是介绍成专家，那如果观众反应还是演讲很赞，那削弱结论，如果观众反应演讲一般，那就加强结论。

选E

2、学生不再需要老师，因为他们可以自己上网找资料。但是老师不会这么快被计算机替代，因为——
问explain
思考：对比型，找出老师额外的优点，或计算机额外的缺点

A：计算机更有效率。方向反了。
B：老师对计算机的使用也越来越熟悉了。没有提到优缺点。
C：如果学生不被监管，他们就不会自觉找资料。正确，计算机额外的缺点。
D：学生用电脑更熟练。方向反了。
E：网上信息比传统书本更up-to-date。方向反了。

选C

_Salaxy_

EC

断了的弦

dc

svwma

EC

tankhuang

大月亮cyn 发表于 2021-10-18 19:31
Day132
1. E
有一个实验，一个演员假装自己是专家，讲一些看起来很学术但没什么实质的东西。但观众还是觉得 ...

同意！