ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3524|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[阅读小分队] 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第142天 失业的解决之道

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2021-8-19 15:10:59 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动,加微信号killgmat

关注考什么试微信公众号~获取第一时间考试新闻,心经和经验分享



The high unemployment rates of the early 1960s occasioned a spirited debate within the economics profession. One group found the primary cause of unemployment in slow growth and the solution in economic expansion. The other found the major explanation in changes that had occurred in the supply and demand for labor and stressed measures for matching demand with supply.

The expansionist school of thought, with the Council of Economic Advisers as its leading advocates, attributed the persistently high unemployment level to a slow rate of economic growth resulting from a deficiency of aggregate demand for goods and services. The majority of this school endorsed the position of the Council that tax reduction would eventually reduce the unemployment level to 4% of the labor force with no other assistance. At 4%, bottlenecks in skilled labor, middle-level manpower, and professional personnel were expected to retard growth and generate wage-price pressures. To go beyond 4%, the interim goal of the Council, it was recognized that improved education, training and retraining, and other structural measures would be required. Some expansionists insisted that the demand for goods and services was nearly satiated and that it was impossible for the private sector to absorb a significant increase in output. In their estimate, only the lower-income fifth of the population and the public sector offered sufficient outlets for the productive efforts of the potential labor force. The fact that the needs of the poor and the many unmet demands for public services held higher priority than the demands of the marketplace in the value structure of this group no doubt influenced their economic judgments.

Those who found the major cause of unemployment in structural features were primarily labor economists, concerned professionally with efficient functioning of labor markets through pro-grams to develop skills and place individual workers. They maintained that increased aggregate demand was a necessary but not sufficient condition for reaching either the CEA’s 4% target or their own preferred 3%. This pessimism was based, in part, on the conclusion that unemployment among the young, the unskilled, minority groups, and depressed geographical areas is not easily attacked by increasing general demand. Further, their estimate of the numbers of potential members of the labor force who had withdrawn or not entered because of lack of employment opportunity was substantially higher than that of the CEA. They also projected that increased demand would put added pressure on skills already in short supply rather than employ the unemployed, and that because of technological change, which was replacing manpower, much higher levels of demand would be necessary to create the same number of jobs.

The structural school, too, had its hyperenthusiasts: Fiscal conservatives who, as an alternative to expansionary policies, argued the not very plausible position that a job was available for every person, provided only that he or she had the requisite skills or would relocate. Such extremist positions aside, there was actually considerable agreement between two main groups, though this was not recognized at the time. Both realized the advisability of a tax cut to increase demand, and both needed to reduce unemployment below a point around 4%. In either case, the policy implications differed in emphasis and not in content.


1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) suggest some ways in which tools to manipulate aggregate demand and eliminate structural deficiencies can be used to reduce the level of unemployment
(B) demonstrate that there was a good deal of agreement between the expansionist and structuralist theories on how to reduce unemployment in the 1960s
(C) explain the way in which structural inefficiencies prevent the achievement of a low rate of unemployment without wage-price pressures
(D) discuss the disunity within the expansionist and structuralist schools to show its relationship to the inability of the government to reduce unemployment to 4%
(E) describe the role of the Council of Economic Advisers in advocating expansionist policies to reduce unemployment to 4%


2. Which of the following is not mentioned in the passage as a possible barrier to achieving a 4% unemployment rate through increased aggregate demand?
(A) Technological innovation reduces the need for workers, so larger increases in demand are needed to employ the same number of workers.
(B) The increase in output necessary to meet an increase in aggregate demand requires skilled labor, which is already in short supply, rather than unskilled labor, which is available.
(C) An increase in aggregate demand will not create jobs for certain subgroups of unemployed persons such as minority groups and young and unskilled workers.
(D) Even if the tax reduction increases aggregate demand, many unemployed workers will be unwilling to relocate to jobs located in areas where there is a shortage of labor.
(E) An increase in the number of available jobs will encourage people not in the labor market to enter it, which in turn will keep the unemployment rate high.


3. The author’s treatment of the “hyperenthusiasts” (Text in Red) can best be described as one of
(A) strong approval
(B) lighthearted appreciation
(C) summary dismissal
(D) contemptuous sarcasm
(E) malicious rebuke


4. Which of the following best describes the difference between the position taken by the Council of Economic Advisers and that taken by dissenting expansionists (Text in Blue)?
(A) Whereas the Council of Economic Advisers emphasized the need for a tax cut to stimulate general demand, the dissenters stressed the importance of structural measures such as education and training.
(B) Although the dissenters agreed that an increase in demand was necessary to reduce unemployment, they argued government spending to increase demand should fund programs for lower income groups and public services.
(C) The Council of Economic Advisers set a 4% unemployment rate as its goal, and dissenting expansionists advocated a goal of 3%.
(D) The Council of Economic Advisers rejected the contention, advanced by the dissenting expansionists, that a tax cut would help to create increased demand.
(E) The dissenting expansionists were critical of the Council of Economic Advisers because members of the Council advocated politically conservative policies.


5. The passage contains information that helps to explain which of the following?
(A) The fact that the economy did not expand rapidly in the early 1960s.
(B) The start of wage-price pressures as the unemployment rate approaches 4%.
(C) The harmful effects of unemployment on an individual worker.
(D) The domination of the Council of Economics by expansionists.
(E) The lack of education and training among workers in some sectors.


6. Which of the following best describes the author’s attitude toward the expansionists (Highlighted)?
(A) The author doubts the validity of their conclusions because they were not trained economists.
(B) The author discounts the value of their judgment because it was colored by their political viewpoint.
(C) The author refuses to evaluate the value of their contention because he lacks sufficient information.
(D) The author accepts their viewpoint until it can be demonstrated that it is incorrect.
(E) The author endorses the principles on which their conclusions are based but believes their proposal to be impractical.


7. It can be inferred from the passage that the hyperenthusiasts (Text in Red) contended that
(A) the problem of unemployment could be solved without government retraining and education programs
(B) the number of persons unemployed was greatly overestimated by the Council of Economic Advisers
(C) a goal of 3% unemployment could not be reached unless the government enacted retraining and education programs
(D) the poor had a greater need for expanded government services than the more affluent portion of the population
(E) fiscal policies alone were powerful enough to reduce the unemployment rate to 4% of the work force


参考答案:
BDCBBBA

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2021-8-21 16:34:27 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
板凳
发表于 2021-8-21 23:26:54 | 只看该作者
DEABAEC
地板
发表于 2021-8-23 09:42:55 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
5#
发表于 2021-8-23 23:54:49 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
6#
发表于 2021-8-24 22:47:17 | 只看该作者
DCCEAEC
7#
发表于 2021-8-25 20:36:52 | 只看该作者
KK
8#
发表于 2021-11-7 14:40:58 | 只看该作者
1 D
2 B
3 B
4 B
5 C
6 B
7 A
9#
发表于 2021-11-7 15:48:09 | 只看该作者
文章结构
介绍两种学派主张——学派1内容介绍——学派2内容介绍——总结两个学派异同
文章内容
扩张主义:需求不足导致经济增长缓慢所以失业率高,支持减税与结构性促进措施+缺陷:认为穷人的需求比市场更重要——结构性注意:用发展技能和安置推动劳动市场+缺陷对特殊人群影响小,技术的消极影响——总结:两种学派政策的重点不同内容相同
作者的态度和意图
通过指出两种学派的主张和缺陷说明两种经济学在主张减少失业率上侧重点不同但是内容相同
反思
-我觉得可以把态度题的正确答案和原文对应单独做一个文档,深刻体会不同态度之间内容如何呈现。做态度题时我可以判断出作者是反对还是支持,但是当题目出现更细微的区别答案,如“否定?蔑视的否定?谴责性的否定”,我往往无法进行准确选择。
-做主旨题一定摇醒自己,大声的说“涉及和部分不是主旨!!!!”
-做题是很容易被文章的主旨牵着走,自己脑补细节题。比如第二题问“文中没有提到哪一个阻碍?”,E说“现有工作机会增加...会增加失业率”,我认为这个明显错,首先工作机会增加怎么可能失业率上升?全文都在说降低失业率,这个工作机会增加和失业率搭配很明显是不对的。但是回到原文发现原文说的是“Further, their estimate of the numbers of potential
members of the labor force who had withdrawn or not entered because of lack of employment opportunity was substantially higher than that of the CEA.”,这一句话中potential想表达的是“还有很多没有被记录的(因为没有就业机会而没有进入劳动市场的)失业的人”,所以E选项所说如果机会增加,这些人呢就会被鼓励进入市场——potential的失业者就会大量“显现”,在数据上让失业率增加。以后看到这种与全文基调相反的内容和答案不要排除。
-不要看到原文没有提到的名词就排除答案,可能这个答案被高度概括。比如第6题的B选项当中的“The author discounts the value of their judgment because it was colored by their
political viewpoint. ”我没有看出扩张主义者那一段哪里有“political viewpoint”,那一段出现的个体只有“CEA”“扩张学派学者”哪里出现了politically?但是CEA的全称可以看出这应该是一个国家机构,减税则是国家财政政策可以指向political。
10#
发表于 2021-11-11 23:16:12 | 只看该作者
关于high unemployment的原因有两派
1. expansion-
2. structural-
主要都是细节 tax cut的2种方式的不同点
最后总结尽管不同也有相同
d(x) 以为末尾的总结篇幅短不那么重要?
de(x) c/e之间犹豫选错
bbb
c(x) 注意问的是hyperenthusiasts是怎么想的 而不是作者批评他。hyper想的是a job was available for every person, provided only that he or she had the requisite skills or would relocate
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-24 10:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部