ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4323|回复: 20
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[阅读小分队] 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第133天 考古测试方法

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2021-8-10 06:21:07 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动,加微信号killgmat

关注考什么试微信公众号~获取第一时间考试新闻,心经和经验分享


For absolute dating of archeological artifacts, the radiocarbon method emerged during the latter half of the twentieth century as the most reliable and precise method. The results of obsidian (volcanic glass) dating, a method based on the belief that newly exposed obsidian surfaces absorb moisture from the surrounding atmosphere at a constant rate, proved uneven. It was initially thought that the thickness of the hydration layer would provide a means of calculating the time elapsed since the fresh surface was made. But this method failed to account for the chemical variability in the physical and chemical mechanism of obsidian hydration. Moreover, each geographic source presented unique chemical characteristics, necessitating a trace element analysis for each such source. Yet, despite its limitations, obsidian dating helped archeologists identify the sources of many obsidian artifacts and to identify in turn ancient exchange networks for the flow of goods. Nor were ceramic studies and fluoride analysis supplanted entirely by the radiocarbon method, which in use allows for field labeling and laboratory errors, as well as sample contamination. In addition, in the 1970s dendrochronological (tree-ring) studies on the bristlecone pine showed that deviation from radiocarbon values increases as one moves back in time. Eventually calibration curves were developed to account for this phenomenon; but in the archeological literature we still find dual references to radiocarbon and sidereal, or calendar, time.


1. Based on the information in the passage, which of the following is LEAST likely to have been a means of dating archeological artifacts?
(A) Ceramics studies
(B) Radiocarbon dating
(C) Dendrochronological studies
(D) Fluoride analysis
(E) Obsidian hydration-layer analysis


2. In the passage, the author mentions all of the following as problems with radiocarbon dating EXCEPT:
(A) disparities with the calendar dating system.
(B) deterioration of samples.
(C) identification errors by archeological field workers.
(D) contamination of artifacts.
(E) mistakes by laboratory workers.


3. With which of the following statements would the passage’s author most likely agree?
(A) The greater the time that has elapsed since exposure of obsidian surface to moisture the less reliable the results of obsidian dating.
(B) The hydration layer accumulating through obsidian moisture absorption varies in thickness depending on the amount of surface area exposed to moisture.
(C) The unpredictability of the obsidian hydration process renders the obsidian dating method roblematic as a means of determining historical trade routes.
(D) The results of obsidian dating are as reliable and precise as those of fluoride analysis only if trace element analysis is performed for the geographic source of the obsidian.
(E) An obsidian artifact can be reliably dated using the obsidian method only if certain environmental conditions where the artifact was found are considered.


参考答案:
CBE

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2021-8-10 09:31:34 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
mark
板凳
发表于 2021-8-10 10:00:48 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
地板
发表于 2021-8-10 11:19:37 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
5#
发表于 2021-8-10 13:04:39 | 只看该作者
For absolute dating of archeological artifacts, the radiocarbon method emerged during the latter half of the twentieth century as the most reliable and precise method. The results of obsidian (volcanic glass) dating, a method based on the belief that newly exposed obsidian surfaces absorb moisture from the surrounding atmosphere at a constant rate, proved uneven. It was initially thought that the thickness of the hydration layer would provide a means of calculating the time elapsed since the fresh surface was made. But this method failed to account for the chemical variability in the physical and chemical mechanism of obsidian hydration. Moreover, each geographic source presented unique chemical characteristics, necessitating a trace element analysis for each such source. Yet, despite its limitations, obsidian dating helped archeologists identify the sources of many obsidian artifacts and to identify in turn ancient exchange networks for the flow of goods. Nor were ceramic studies and fluoride analysis supplanted entirely by the radiocarbon method, which in use allows for field labeling and laboratory errors, as well as sample contamination. In addition, in the 1970s dendrochronological (tree-ring) studies on the bristlecone pine showed that deviation from radiocarbon values increases as one moves back in time. Eventually calibration curves were developed to account for this phenomenon; but in the archeological literature we still find dual references to radiocarbon and sidereal, or calendar, time.
文章结构:
1. 介绍通过测moisture判断 + 缺点不稳定 + 识别network
2. Tree-ring studies + concern
6#
发表于 2021-8-10 15:27:45 | 只看该作者
mark
7#
发表于 2021-8-10 21:37:40 | 只看该作者
CAC
8#
发表于 2021-8-11 03:05:31 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
9#
发表于 2021-8-12 17:41:27 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
10#
发表于 2021-8-13 05:10:31 | 只看该作者
谢谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-8 22:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部