ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3894|回复: 22
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[阅读小分队] 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第57天 游戏公司起起落落

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2021-5-26 10:19:40 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动,加微信号killgmat


Like any industry, the gaming industry has seen several cycles of expansion and consolidation. In many cases, trends and developments have enabled cagey and successful newcomers to absorb staid stalwarts who lost their edge. But over-expansion and an inability to maintain flexibility have turned the tables on more than one aggressive upstart.

Such was the case with Wizards of the Coast, following a breakout emergence in 1993. Known traditionally as a struggling outfit of gamers with more passion than business experience, Wizards of the Coast in 1993 published the now legendary title Magic: The Gathering and, in the process, rewrote the book on gaming. Combining the popularity of trading cards with a combative pseudo-role-playing game system, Magic spawned the collectible trading card game genre and became a whirlwind success. Sweeping through the related communities of gaming, collectibles, and fandom, the game sold in unprecedented numbers. The drive to win required players to amass decks containing the most powerful and rarest of cards. The card-hoarding mentality drove frenzied sales whenever the rumor of a new card's release spread across the budding Internet communities.

The trading card business flourished as many in the target market found themselves moving into professional careers with dramatically increased disposable income. Flush with cash, Wizards of the Coast sought acquisitions and, in 1997, acquired TSR, the famed owner of Dungeons and Dragons. This classic game was not only responsible for the rise of the modern social gaming market but was still the genre's most popular title. Spread thin and across many product lines, TSR had become a victim of its own success, unwilling to return to core product lines after diversifying into novels, video games, and even Saturday morning cartoons. TSR came at a discount and the management of Wizards immediately began making tough decisions and culling dead product areas.

Concurrently, Wizards' own expansion continued as a series of retail stores and clubs opened, providing places for players of Magic and other games to gather and play. Elaborate plans were made to re-launch much of the Dungeons and Dragons line in a new series of books and player aids. Finally, in 1999, old-school corporate America arrived in the form of Hasbro, which acquired Wizards at a phenomenal premium. For ownership of a company that was piling success upon success, however, no price seemed too high.

Unfortunately, a number of facts conspired to reverse the meteoric rise and bring about a gradual, painful descent. The seemingly inexhaustible interest in increasingly elaborate trading card games waned, and even the core offerings of Magic and Pokemon lost their excitement. The "dot-com" crash played its role in the decline since much of the fast-climbing IT profession, long a center of gaming and collectibles, found itself on hard times. Traditional role-playing gamers were disturbed by the push to release revised versions of Dungeons and Dragons and balked at several high-profile and high-budget launches. Soon Wizards' retail stores were closing and, in 2003, even its massive Seattle flagship store was forced to close. Today, Wizards of the Coast continues as a subsidiary of Hasbro, marketing to the more serious hobbyist gamer rather than to the casual game buyer. Ironically, its major income sources are now the various Dungeons and Dragons titles acquired years ago from then-struggling TSR.

1. According to the passage, the struggles of Wizards of the Coast could best be seen as
A. not uncommon among game companies.
B. significantly more extreme than those faced by other game companies.
C. effectively identical to those faced by TSR.
D. a sign of the times during the "dot-com" crash.
E. the direct result of inexperienced management.


2. The tone of this passage could best be summarized as:
A. ambivalent
B. optimistic
C. revisionary
D. disparaging
E. cautionary

3. According to the information in the passage, at the time of its acquisition by Wizards of the Coast, TSR had been involved with all of the following products EXCEPT:
A.Saturday morning cartoons
B. Role-playing games
C. Collectible trading card games
D. Works of fiction
E. Video games

参考答案:
AEC

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2021-5-26 15:17:16 | 只看该作者
A E C
板凳
发表于 2021-5-26 16:26:53 发自手机 Web 版 | 只看该作者
看一下
地板
发表于 2021-5-26 17:07:39 | 只看该作者
acc
5#
发表于 2021-5-27 08:47:27 | 只看该作者
ACD
6#
发表于 2021-5-27 10:04:07 | 只看该作者
EEC
7#
发表于 2021-5-27 10:27:00 发自 iPad 设备 | 只看该作者
同意!               
8#
发表于 2021-5-27 15:01:29 | 只看该作者
Acc
9#
发表于 2021-5-27 16:22:33 | 只看该作者
1. 过度扩张和无法保持flexibility是游戏公司商业失败的原因
2. 举了WOC公司的例子,1993年发布了一款游戏M卖的很好(trading+role playing)
3.1997年WOC收购TSR,但是TSR发展的不好,原因是产品太多
4. WOC一直扩张,之后被H收购,生意跌落

AEB
10#
发表于 2021-5-27 18:00:33 | 只看该作者
ECC
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-18 19:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部