- UID
- 1542685
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2023-4-21
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
P1. "WHYS>HOWS" 用研究來看對存錢的影響
P2. 作者的ˊ舉例及解釋-> 論點1. WHYS不會僵持在計畫, 把握其他機會
P3. 作者提出第二個論點, 若能完全理解WHYS的計畫比較有效率(特別是在甚麼情況下)
-
P1.
1. Context: WHYS >> HOWS
2. Study: consumer fixated on how difficult in achieving their aims
3. Elaborate: four experiments saving moneys -> HOWS(plan) vs. WHYS(no plan)
“WHYS” can achieve goal (avoid the candy purchase)
P2.
1. Explanation: people (HOWS) focus on concrete plans -> out-of-plan opportunities (X)
2. Argument①: people (WHYS) -> out-of-plan opportunities (O)
P3
1. Argument②: “WHYS” planning is more effective
2. Elaborate: particularly “when original plan is unrealistic” or “when other goal-directed activities avasilble”
|
|