ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1258|回复: 1

[逻辑小分队] 求大佬讲解这一道must be ture

[复制链接]
发表于 2020-11-28 21:10:50 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than the lawyers who do not advertise.Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.
If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?
(A) Some lawyers who now advertise will charge more for specific services if they do not have to specify fee arrangements in the advertisements.
(B) More consumers will use legal services if there are fewer restrictions on the advertising of legal services.
(C) If the restriction against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements is removed, more lawyers will advertise their services. C
(D) If more lawyers advertise lower prices for specific services, some lawyers who do not advertise will also charge less than they currently charge for those services.
(E) If the only restrictions on the advertising of legal services were those that apply to every type of advertising, most lawyers would advertise their services.

毛毛对这道题解释是C对原文第一句的重写,perfect
但是must be ture不是找答案句是Paraphrased Answers,对结论的重写吗?

发表于 2020-11-29 08:50:18 | 显示全部楼层
选项C是direct inference of the 1st statement(首句)
must be true不一定是对the statements above的结论重写哦。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-3-29 14:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部