GWD31-16 请大家讨论

考试专业户

这题我没想通，为了让大家注意到这题，我又重开了一贴，汗。。。。。

这是连接：

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=24&id=162640

dogmousepwc

实在觉得E不好。新技术好不代表市场好，只能说他在技术上领先，不能说他在市场上领先啊！至少我们不能通过E排除这个可能吧。（我觉得中国的那个小灵通是个例子吧）

而且题目问的是most benefit,我想是说要是大家都买L-L的产品，这小子还不赚翻了。但是B说了，L-L想要卖的多就必须能造的多，要投入很多扩大生产。因此L-L不会赚翻了！注意是赚翻了哦，呵呵

个人意见。拍砖吧

 

babypigsxm

我觉得E是不对的，它强调的是before requiring regeneration，而且说是让信号传得更快而已，不管传得多快，最终还是要经过regenerator，这样E选项对于那家公司以后的前景没有起到削弱的作用，但是B选项说要生产regenerator要花很多其他的成本，因为就算所有的regenerator都是Light-line生产的，但是它的成本也很高，因此对这间公司来说，并不是非常有利的，这样就对它的prospects有削弱作用。D选项整个脱离了原题的范围，也是不对的

mc637t

覺得b跟e都有消弱的功用

就gwd的模式來看,直接影響跟間接影響比較,就會選擇b

如同文法中的主動跟被動語句,多數先選主動狀態

itokinblue

哎~~偶也选的B哇!!当时看到E的时候还愣了下..不过又觉得说不清楚...所以还是选B了，感觉告诉我关于这种利润的问题要考虑成本..

 

现在想想B,怎么讲呢,可以讲对,可以讲不对.

如果从纯数字的角度看的话,我一开始投资1million,我的成本费用占了45%,那么我这样可以赚0.55m是吧~

然后我扩大再生产,我投资100m,成本费用上升到50%,那么就可以赚50m了~钱赚的是多了...

但是从投资项目评估的角度看,这种追加成本是绝对不合理的!!

 

而E选项的话,就算更加快又能怎么样呢?也许现在的那种快已经是sufficient了~

 

考试不能碰到这种题目!!

gonghao

vote for E always

lxzjojo

偶选的E，但还是有点想不能，分析一下下：

首先，B一定不是正确答案，问题问的是casts the most doubt on the prediction about light-ling’s prospects?而B说的是，对啊LL要发展，一定要投入更多人工成品和材料，这不是多余的吗？要有产出一定要有投入啊，凭什么说偶增加投入会减少偶产生利润的可能性啊？显然不是削弱。

然后E说，有好几家厂都在发展一种新技术，如果成功的话，传输速度会比现在没有re技术快好多呐~

偶对E的理解是，原文中说Light-Line is the leading manufacturer
                    of signal regenerators.，有了E就暗示了你以后也许就不是那个leading的公司啦，你的江湖地位都不保啦，怎么还可能most benefit呢？所以削弱了原文结论。
                    

倒是那个D，偶一直没想明白说得是啥意思，如果偶没理解错，它是说已经有一些技术，是可以令信号传输不需要通过线路或者光纤来进行啦。都不用了，那LL自然不能赚钱啦，那岂不也削弱了原文吗？

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-15 17:15:29编辑过]

sigrid920

引用某NN的话:

vote for E

in choice B：Expending investment on the material and labor is such a defence that is not sufficient.Beside what you expend on each product,there is always a corresponding incomes from each products in terms of its cost ,including cost from material , cost from labor and cost from machine as well.You will get the profit from each of your product when you minize your cost on matrial and labor.

in choice D: it says that there is an alternative way by which signals could pass it through.But we don't what it is .whether it could make the transmittion much faster or further.If the answer is "not",then the it will not be a problem .Let it be there ,and it won't get along with the profit-making by LL,a leading manufactuer

in choice E:it is said that there will be some companies focus on develop some new technoloy that will make the signal transmit much further than that present.If the it is true the totally requirments for the product,regenators ,will break down.And then the benifit will be undermined.

jackzhu69

选E

目的：否定LL可以从long-distance construction 中获益

B: 如果LL要有成本投入，对其他公司也一样，无法比较

E:  因为某种外因导致LL无法从long-distance construction 中获益，是最直接的答案了

16: In recent years, networks of fiber-optic cable have been replacing electrical wire for transmitting telecommunications signals. Signals running through fiber-optic cables deteriorate, and so the signals must be run through a piece of equipment called a regenerator before being transmitted father. Light-Line is the leading manufacturer of signal regenerators. Therefore, Light-line is one of the companies that will most benefit if new long-distance fiber-optic telecommunications networks are constructed.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the prediction about light-ling’s prospects?

A: Telecommunications signals sent along electrical wires can travel much farther than signals transmitted through fiber-optic before needing to be regenerated.

B: Expanding its production of regenerators will require Light-line to spend proportionately more on labor and materials.

C: The volume of signals that a fiber-optic cable can carry is several thousand times greater than the volume that can be carried by an electrical wire of similar size.

D: There are technologies that enable telecommunications signals to be transmitted without either wire or fiber-optic cable.

E: Several manufacturers are developing regenerator technologies that will allow signals to be transmitted many times farther than at present before requiring regeneration.

llxx1985cn

 终于明白了~~

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-13 9:49:22编辑过]