一道难题300里的题目，求解，进来的考试人品大爆发！

奥特慢慢慢

原题如下:The contingency-fee system, which allows lawyers and their clients to
agree that the lawyer will be paid only in the event of success, does not
increase the number of medical malpractice lawsuits brought against doctors.
As attorneys must cover the costs for their time and research, they want to be
assured that any medical malpractice case they accept on a contingency-fee
basis has substantial merit. Consequently, attorneys turn away many people
who come to see them, for lack of a good case.
.
The argument above is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it fails
to
.
A. specify the criteria attorneys use to judge the merits of a medical
malpractice case
B. consider whether, in the absence of a contingency-fee option, even people
with meritorious cases are much less likely to initiate litigation if they
believe they might incur large legal fees
C. note whether, in successful medical malpractice lawsuits, the average
monetary award after legal costs have been deducted is less under
contingency-fee arrangements than otherwise
D. consider the effect of the contingency-fee system on the number of
lawsuits sought for reasons other than medical malpractice
E. acknowledge the rising cost of medical malpractice insurance

这道题答案B，对于C不太明白，C选项的意思不是在contingency-fee arrangements条件下扣除成本的收入更少吗，这样按照我的理解大家就更不愿意选择contingency-fee option了。但是解析里说C是加强了结论，原话：C. This implies that the contingency-fee option would reduce costs. Therefore, there would be more incentive to bring cases under the contingency-fee option. This strengthens the argument. 这个让我太疑惑了，求大神解释！！！谢谢！！！

MandyFeeling

我觉得这道题有点绕，也不知道能不能帮你解释清楚。
我认为题目中的conclusion是最后一句
所以C项说没考虑到（题干中有fail to）在successful的情况下，award在这种arrangements下是否比其他的少→所以attorneys就会选择contingency-fee system呀，因为他们只考虑到substantial merits会带来success，忽视了这个system下award可能比其他情况少的缺点→相当于是在赞成contingency-system，不能削弱
B项是说没考虑到是否即使没有这个system，那些会incur large costs但with meritotious的case也会被更少地initiate litigation→那就可以说明有了这个system之后turn away是因为large costs而不是这些cases without merits→恰恰削弱了conclusion，证明turn away不是因为lace of good cases而是costs的原因

jimchiu

因为C选项用的是weather，就是一个是否条件，然后解析里也很谨慎地用了imply，所以把C选项当成一个条件去考虑，再放到题目中，而不是一个绝对的律师的award会减少这个结论。这样考虑的话，就会发现，如果有了这个条件，律师会因为cost这个条件去拒绝system，和题干相符合。（乱

RISSE_娇

MandyFeeling 发表于 2019-11-1 11:19
我觉得这道题有点绕，也不知道能不能帮你解释清楚。
我认为题目中的conclusion是最后一句
所以C项说没考虑 ...

同意！               

鸿安

结论：
The contingency-fee system, which allows lawyers and their clients to
agree that the lawyer will be paid only in the event of success, does not
increase the number of medical malpractice lawsuits brought against doctors.
说的是该方案并没有使诉讼增加，答案C说的是报酬的多少，和诉讼多少没有任何关系

奥特慢慢慢

我好像明白了，感谢！！！几天没上CD了

奥特慢慢慢

RISSE_娇 发表于 2019-11-1 12:43
同意！

谢谢童鞋！我懂了

奥特慢慢慢

MandyFeeling 发表于 2019-11-1 11:19
我觉得这道题有点绕，也不知道能不能帮你解释清楚。
我认为题目中的conclusion是最后一句
所以C项说没考虑 ...

刚刚回复错了！谢谢你，我感觉那个fail to确实忽略了！

奥特慢慢慢

jimchiu 发表于 2019-11-1 11:26
因为C选项用的是weather，就是一个是否条件，然后解析里也很谨慎地用了imply，所以把C选项当成一个条件去考 ...

好像并没太懂TT，不过这题我明白啦，谢谢！

Ashly77

题目难到像800分的亚子。。