ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: ProteinMonica
打印 上一主题 下一主题

==考试日志==

[复制链接]
341#
发表于 2005-10-23 23:16:00 | 只看该作者

auro你的进度好快啊。真是让人羡慕。


有什么感受啊,你是如何总结的。说来听听!



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-23 23:28:23编辑过]
342#
发表于 2005-10-24 09:48:00 | 只看该作者

Q2: GWD-4-14


Guidebook writer:  I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.  Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?




  • The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.

  • Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

  • The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.

  • The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.

  • The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.

  • (D),谁能翻译下!

    343#
    发表于 2005-10-24 09:55:00 | 只看该作者

    Newspaper editorial:


    In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher.  art of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses.  However, this action is clearly counter to the governor's ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.


    Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?


    A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
    B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
    C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
    D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate's subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
    E. The governor's ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.


    A: (在狱中)没能上这个大学课程的不倾向能阻止任何人去犯本来要犯的罪。
    缩写:该措施(不让读大学课程),不能阻止犯罪。
    取非:该措施(不让读大学课程),能阻止犯罪。(与governor讲的话一样!)


    这是juh JJ给的解释.


    原文的argument:this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal


    A,取非后,结论不成立吗.


    why A还错呢?



    344#
    发表于 2005-10-24 09:59:00 | 只看该作者

    Q23 to Q26:


          Why firms adhere to or deviate


           from their strategic plans is poorly


           understood. However, theory and


    Line limited research suggest that the


      (5)      process through which such plans


    emerge may(给出解释) play a part.  In particular,


    top management decision-sharing


    consensus-oriented, team-based


    decision-makingmay increase the


    (10)      likelihood that firms will adhere to their


    plans, because those involved in the


    decision-making may be more com-


    mitted to the chosen course of action,


    thereby increasing the likelihood that


    (15)      organizations will subsequently adhere


    to their plans.


          However, the relationship between


    top management decision-sharing and


    adherence to plans may be affected


    (20)      by a firm’s strategic mission( kw) (its fun-


           damental approach to increasing


           sales revenue and market share, and


    generating cash flow and short-term


    profits).  At one end of the strategic


    (25)      mission continuum, “build” strategies


    are pursued when a firm desires to


    increase its market share and is willing


    to sacrifice short-term profits to do so.


    At the other end, “harvest” strategies


    (30)      are used when a firm is willing to


    sacrifice marked share for short-term


    profitability and cash-flow maximiza-


           tion.  Research and theory suggest


    that top management decision-sharing


    (35)     may have a more positive relationship


    with adherence to plans among firms


    with harvest strategies than among


    firms with build strategies. 后面解释 In a study


          of strategic practices in several large


    (40)     firms, managers in harvest strategy


    scenarios were more able to adhere


    to their business plans.  As one of the


    managers in the study explained it,


    this is partly because “[t]ypically all a


    (45)      manager has to do [when implementing


    a harvest strategy] is that which was


    done last year.”  Additionally, man-


    agers under harvest strategies may


    have fewer strategic options than do


    (50)      those under build strategies; it may


    therefore be easier to reach agree-


    ment on a particular course of action


    through decision-sharing, which will


    in turn tend to promote adherence


    (55)      to plans.  Conversely, in a “build”


    strategy scenario, individual leader-


    ship, rather than decision-sharing,


    may promote adherence to plans.


    Build strategies—which typically


    (60)      require leaders with strong perso-


    nal visions for a firm’s future, rather


    than the negotiated compromise


    of the team-based decision—may


    be most closely adhered to when


    (65)      implemented in the context of a clear


    strategic vision of an individual leader,


    rather than through the practice of


    decision-sharing.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Q23:


    Which of the following best describes the function of the first sentence (lines 17-24) of the second paragraph of the passage?


                  



  • To answer a question posed in the first sentence of the passage about why firms adopt particular strategic missions

  • To refute an argument made in the first paragraph about how top management decision-making affects whether firms will adhere to their strategic plans

  • To provide evidence supporting a theory introduced in the first paragraph about what makes firms adhere to or deviate from their strategic plants

  • To qualify an assertion made in the preceding sentence (lines 6-16) about how top management decision-making affects the likelihood that firms will adhere to their strategic plans

  • To explain a distinction relied on in the second paragraph (lines 17-68) regarding two different kinds of strategic missions

  • D和E区别在哪?


    为什么不是 qualify呢?

    345#
    发表于 2005-10-24 10:05:00 | 只看该作者

    Q30:


    Which of the following most logically completes the argument?



    The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage.  However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods.  For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain.  roponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking.  However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.




    1. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life

    2. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has

    3. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods

    4. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is

    5. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded

    E和C,大家怎么看

    346#
    发表于 2005-10-24 10:10:00 | 只看该作者

    TO ZX,


    The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.


    建筑的原有工艺的质量越好,被废弃和损坏的可能性就越小。

    347#
    发表于 2005-10-24 16:02:00 | 只看该作者

    谢谢香香茶的翻译.



    发现feifei数学7居然有80道,狂faint.


    348#
    发表于 2005-10-24 21:04:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用zx_nju在2005-10-24 9:55:00的发言:

    为了reduce the crime rate, the governor 采取措施(Part of this effort ... college-level courses. )   Editorial 说 措施没达目的(since一个观察到的事实)


    问: Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?


    A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
    B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
    C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
    D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate's subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
    E. The governor's ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.


    A: (在狱中)没能上这个大学课程的不倾向能阻止任何人去犯本来要犯的罪。
    缩写:该措施(不让读大学课程),不能阻止犯罪。(A是原结论的否命题)
    看原文:该措施(不让读大学课程),能阻止犯罪。(是原结论


    这是juh JJ给的解释.


    原文的argument:this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal


    A,取非后,结论不成立吗.


    why A还错呢?




    日思夜想许久,对此题终于“开窍”!哈哈!现无私奉献贴出来,欢迎拍砖!

    此题就是费费所指的:not + weaken 型假设!

    A错原因有2:1)A是原结论的否命题,意思是它不一定能成立。对于一个可能成立,也可能不成立的选项,当然得排除喽。2)注意anyone是不是一个极端词?

    琢磨琢磨吧。。。

    349#
    发表于 2005-10-24 21:48:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用ProteinMonica在2005-10-22 12:51:00的发言:

    juhMM细致的讲解好棒哦!感觉花了很多时间去揣摩ets的意图和我们容易犯的错误。崇拜崇拜 。那个无关字眼排出的方法我也要试试看,因为逻辑虽然能做对,但有时候要花费>2分钟的时间。

    谢谢ProteinMonica的鼓励,无关词排除法确实是某牛提出的,应该是一种可靠依据(不是偶的发明)!据说在归纳,假设,加强,填空里都能用的上。十分惭愧,具体如何运用,偶也没十分把握。。。
    350#
    发表于 2005-10-24 22:57:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用juh在2005-10-24 21:04:00的发言:


    日思夜想许久,对此题终于“开窍”!哈哈!现无私奉献贴出来,欢迎拍砖!

    此题就是费费所指的:not + weaken 型假设!

    A错原因有2:1)A是原结论的否命题,意思是它不一定能成立。对于一个可能成立,也可能不成立的选项,当然得排除喽。2)注意anyone是不是一个极端词?

    琢磨琢磨吧。。。


    看原文:该措施(不让读大学课程),能阻止犯罪。(是原结论

    “However, this action is clearly counter to the governor's ultimate goal”,我认为它是结论。 这个action不能降低crime率。

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-24 03:37
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部