|
to zx
我分析了两题，你可以尝试下分析后面几题。如果还是有问题，告诉我哪里有问题，我们再探讨。
注意：不需将逻辑题目分类，因为考试没有那么多时间。但是要读出文中的逻辑关系
Q2:
Hunter: Hunters alone are blamed for the decline in Greenrock National Forest’s deer population over the past ten years. Yet clearly, black bears have also played an important role in this decline. In the past ten years, the forest’s protected black bear population has risen sharply, and examination of black bears found dead in the forest during the deer hunting season showed that a number of them had recently fed on deer.
In the hunter’s argument, the boldface portion plays which of the following roles?
- It is the main conclusion of the argument.
- It is an objection that has been raised against the main conclusion of the argument.
- It is a judgment that the argument opposes.
- It is a finding that the argument seeks to explain.
- It provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument.
Bold Face题目你就把它当做阅读的一个段落，知道他罗嗦了一大堆，最后的中心思想是什么。
这段文字开头提出鹿的减少只是因为猎人，后面转折Yet clearly black bears have also played an important role in this decline. 接下来说被保护的熊数目大量上升，而且在打猎时候发现一些死熊最近以鹿为食，这部分provides evidence in support of 前面black bears have also played an important role in this decline。所以黑脸部分就是conclusion。
做其他题目也一样，如果知道中心思想是什么，就知道黑脸是support, conclusion,还是opposite等等。
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q9:
Studies in restaurants show that the tips left by customers who pay their bill in cash tend to be larger when the bill is presented on a tray that bears a credit-card logo. Consumer psychologists hypothesize that simply seeing a credit-card logo makes many credit-card holders willing to spend more because it reminds them that their spending power exceeds the cash they have immediately available.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the psychologists’ interpretation of the studies?
- The effect noted in the studies is not limited to patrons who have credit cards.
- Patrons who are under financial pressure from their credit-card obligations tend to tip less when presented with a restaurant bill on a tray with credit-card logo than when the tray has no logo.
- In virtually all of the cases in the studies, the patrons who paid bills in cash did not possess credit cards.
- In general, restaurant patrons who pay their bills in cash leave larger tips than do those who pay by credit card.
- The percentage of restaurant bills paid with given brand of credit card increases when that credit card’s logo is displayed on the tray with which the bill is prepared.
题目是问which supports the psychologists’ interpretation of the studies?
先来找什么是 psychologists interpretation –
很显然 就是： 信用卡拥有者看到信用卡标记就会付更多是因为信用卡标记提醒了他们的花费能力 超过他们手头的现钱。就是说 有信用卡标记会让拥有信用卡的客人联想到他们正在用信用卡的感觉
所有答案如果超出这个范围就是无关
A: 提到没有信用卡的，无关
B: 完全符合逻辑链三个重点
C: 完全无关
D: 用现金付款和用信用卡付款比较，重点不在用什么付款，无关
E: given brand of credit 超出了题目所讨论的范围，无关
这道题目用有关无关就可以判断，关键是搞清楚原文的逻辑链是什么
我做这些题目的思路都一样，1读问题，看他问什么，2 将题目归纳一下理出逻辑范围，3 排除法，把无关的排除，剩下一个，就是选项，剩下如果不止一个，看看会不会是反作用（比如题目是support,答案是weaken），assumption如果实在看不出可以取非。有时候做多了你一眼就能看到正确的，不过还是最好扫一下其他选项保证他们都不对。
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-21 12:12:04编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2005-10-21 00:02:00
楼主
