og中剧院现在表演风格尊重原版的那道题，问题究竟是什么意思？

淹竹

原题贴在下面。
问题是“The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that”。这里considerations是指题干还是选项？that修饰considerations还是修饰argument？
按我的理解，如果considerations指题干，that修饰argument,那么题目问的就是“根据以上题干能推出什么”，是归纳题，应该选一个从题干中能得出的结论；
如果considerations指选项，that跳跃修饰considerations,那么就是问“下面哪个选项能作为推理过程中的一部分”，鉴于题干中已经有conclusion,所以应该选一个加强题干argument的选项。
哪一种理解是正确的呢？求助各位！！

Theater Critic: The play La Finestrina, now at Central Theater, was written in Italy in the eighteenth century. The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater. Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the twentieth-century American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx’s comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in sixteenth-century Italy.
The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that
(A) modern audiences would find it hard to tolerate certain characteristics of a historically accurate performance of an eighteenth-century play
(B) Groucho Marx once performed the part of the character Harlequin in La Finestrina
(C) in the United States the training of actors in the twentieth century is based on principles that do not differ radically from those that underlay the training of actors in eighteenth-century Italy
(D) the performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the director’s claim
(E) the director of La Finestrina must have advised the actor who plays Harlequin to model his performance on comic performances of Groucho Marx

cycgundam

这道题应该是总结题型。

答案是D？

Considerations指的就是整个题干中的premise部分。

The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that，后面跟选项。所以选项修饰的是Argument，而不是considerations。而considerations就是这个argument中的premise。

题目中可以说有conclusion，但也可以说没有一个main conclusion。个人感觉当把D加进去后，整个main conclusion就是那个director并没有claim错，为什么没claim错呢？因为诚然那个actor的表演有20世纪风，但这个20世纪风本身沿袭自16世纪。

淹竹

cycgundam 发表于 2018-7-23 11:00
这道题应该是总结题型。

答案是D？

同意！               我也是这么想的，但是老师的说法是上面的另一种解读哈哈哈。他觉得原文本身的推理过程是有问题的，所以要用选项去填一个gap推出题干中的conclusion